4-5 in 9 games as a starter for a program that hasn't won more than 3 games in how many consecutive seasons now?
WHat four games has he started?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
4-5 in 9 games as a starter for a program that hasn't won more than 3 games in how many consecutive seasons now?
Could the receivers have made amazing plays because of the quarterback?
WHat four games has he started?
You guys do realize we are talking about a walk on senior. I’m thrilled with how he played and he did everything we needed him to do but we’ve been down this road before. Park is clearly and indisputably the more talented player. Kempt played well but it is highly doubtful he ever repeats that performance. We had a lot of easy stuff that developed into big plays. If Park can come back and buy in to that offense he is the much better option.Approximately how many ISU, no other Big XII quarterbacks, have gone into Norman in the last 20 years and thrown for 350+ yds, 3 TDs and no INTs. And it isn't like it was conservative play calling, he wasn't asked to sit on the ball and win the game.
I mean Trent Freaking Dilfer won a superbowl. It isn't just about have the best arm or the most talent at QB. It is about having someone in there that makes the offense go and KK made the offense go today.
There is no way you don't start him going forward. If his play doesn't remain at this level then you have a choice but he has to be #1 right now.
4-5 that includes wins against KU, UNI and Akron. And with the best talent ISU has ever had at WR. Sorry, not good enough.4-5 in 9 games as a starter for a program that hasn't won more than 3 games in how many consecutive seasons now?
KU and Tech last year and Akron and UNI this year.
4-5 that includes wins against KU, UNI and Akron. And with the best talent ISU has ever had at WR. Sorry, not good enough.
Park if ready
/thread
Its a team game. I don't know how you credit one players for wins.That's true. He hasn't had a ton of wins to go with those yards though.
Yes. He earned the ability to earn his job back. Really depends on why he wasn't on the field today doing his job.Park's had more 300 yard passing games than any ISU QB. Has he not earned anything with that?
I think if it was Lanning in Parks’ shoes, many of you would be singing a different tune and would say that he deserves his job back. Whether it’s Parks’ actions, the way he talks, or looks, it seems like there is something about him that bothers you and make you quick to jump to a Walk-On 3rd String Qb that couldn’t start at his JUCO
Its a team game. I don't know how you credit one players for wins.
Laughable how many of you are so ready to move on from Park. The dude is the best QB ISU has seen in years.
Kempt played well for what we asked him to do today but his yardage numbers are super inflated by great individual plays by Ryan, Lazard, and Montgomery Teams will gameplan against him and will completely shut him down. There’s a reason he is a walk on and was 3rd behind noland.
If Park is healthy, he has to be the guy. I would like to see Lanning get used like he did today. 3rd and 1 should be Lanning running the ball. Not quick pass routes.
It’s almost like our playbook was super limited and that was the game plan..The starting QB job should be Kempt's to lose. With the weapons we have on offense, the first thing our QB needs to do is quickly and accurately get the ball to our playmakers in space. Kempt put on a clinic in how to do that today. Park should study this game and learn from Kempt. Having a big arm that can make plays can be helpful of course, but we do not need that to win games.