Where do we go at QB from here?
- Thread starter WIB
- Start date
My vote is kempt... But again, not based on pure talent. But based on the way our coaches coach when he is playing. And because of his timing with the ball, and willingness to just float a ball to lazard when its the right play, even when covered.
Park is easily a better passer. Not even close.
Better decision maker? Leader?
Also our coaches think Park needs to pass 45 times a game which hurts everyone.
Thinking long term in my mind its Park. Re-al is going to need mentoring next year and Park has to be that guy.
I really hope this staff can get it in the kids' heads that "This is where we belong" not, "Oh look at us, lowly ISU beat OU" I've seen this play out, seems past coaches have played along with the media. I don't want this to be a "Signature win" I want it to be a more common occurrence. Seems past coaches have played into the media hype about huge upsets and signature wins. I want us going forward to believe this is what we can do, any day, anywhere.
Last year, I wasn't happy with the decision to bench Lanning. I would have stayed with Lanning as the starter all season long. I like Lanning's ability to move the chains and wear down the defense (along with DM). This year I would pick Kempt over Park based on what we saw today. I have a lot of respect for Park's arm, but his decision making hasn't been all that great especially on 3rd downs.
Kempts sideline demeanor told me everything I need to know. That dude was as cool as the other side of the pillow. OK scored he was basically saying hold my beer while I go win this game.
I love Park's talent and confidence, but if he isn't playing because of disciplinary reasons, failed drug test, etc, he needs to earn his starting position starting with attitude and hard work in practice. That's the way team sports work.
Some of that is Park's weaknesses though. At least 3 or 4 times this year Park could have automatically ran for a first down with nobody touching him but zipped an incompletion instead. Kempt did that today without hesitation even though he's a slower runner it seems. Park doesn't do the simple things to keep the chains moving at times. It's part of why I never thought it was a slam dunk to go with him over Lanning. Highest ceiling throwing the ball? Absolutely. Guaranteed best guy to get the W? I'm not sure.
Kempt just played a great game as we beat the Sooners for the first time in forever. Kempt must get the next start. No brainer.
If I remember right Campbell said in the interview right after the game, he is not a backup QB anymore so who knows. Park obviously has the better arm but if Kempt played against Texas, I tend to think ISU wins that game. he put the ball where WR's could make a play and he got better as the game went on. Also, I really liked his demeanor as someone mentioned. I might be speculating, but I wouldn't be surprised if he has more in the leadership category after what I saw in the Texas game.
Jared Barnett looked like the second coming of Joe Montana at one point too... let's pump the breaks, Kempt will get another shot against Kansas if Park is still not 100%. A 1 game (entire college career) sample size isn't A lot to go off of, but I know how Cyclone nation loves us some qb controversy.
If Park had played like Jacob Park against Texas there wouldn't even be a conversation. One bad game this year vs one great game.
If Park had played like Jacob Park against Texas there wouldn't even be a conversation. One bad game this year vs one great game.
I sort of agree with this, but a quarterback also has to be a leader. And I do think there is something to Park throwing too damn hard.
I did a lot of calculations and maths and voted Kempt because he just beat OU on the road.
I dont disagree.. What I meant by my poorly worded post was Kempt is probably a better leader and decision maker. Our coaches also call a better game with him on field it seems.
Did Kurt Warner or Chuck Long have a gun for an arm? Too early to say if Kempt can be as accurate as those guys, but his throws seem to be just as catchable. Park has started around 10 games and his biggest W was a home game against Texas Tech. I don't think there should be a question about who starts next week.
I think Park is a ways away from being "ready to go"
I also think Kempt will come back to earth within the next two weeks. Sometimes you have a game where everything goes well, I'll be very surprised if he can sustain that high level of play. Hell, if he can, he needed to be the start from game 1!
I also think Kempt will come back to earth within the next two weeks. Sometimes you have a game where everything goes well, I'll be very surprised if he can sustain that high level of play. Hell, if he can, he needed to be the start from game 1!