Year after year is the same story. "We were so close to winning these games! We're going to break through."
Fool me once shame on you...fool me twice...
Yes. Sounds like Cub fans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Year after year is the same story. "We were so close to winning these games! We're going to break through."
Fool me once shame on you...fool me twice...
#1 If we somehow go 4-1 to finish the year Rhoads is off the hot seat until 2016.
#2 If we finish with 2 or 3 wins this year he should be canned.
#3 "Young" isn't an excuse. It means the coaching staff sucked at their jobs for years 1-3 and have no players developed to play. Whether it was an error in ability of the player or the character of the player doesn't matter.
#4 We're trending upwards? Rhoads did a better job with Chizik's players than he has with his own. Rhoads walked into some talent which ended up playing on Sundays. Chizik walked into a garbage roster. Chizik went 5-19 with garbage. Rhoads is now 6-18 in his last 24.
Offensively if we come out and hang 30 on OU I'll start to believe we've turned a corner. If we come out and put up 7 points against OU we'll know it was an anomaly.
#5 People are nuts if they think the players love Rhoads. Teams who love their coach don't have to beg to have a "Players Advisory Council" created because they feel their coach is running them into the ground and they aren't ready to play. Do some of them love him? Yes. Do some of them despise him? Yes. Are they ever going to claim they aren't behind their coach? Hell no, that's PT suicide.
There always seems to be delusional apologists in our fanbase regardless of the results we see on the field each week.#1 If we somehow go 4-1 to finish the year Rhoads is off the hot seat until 2016.
#2 If we finish with 2 or 3 wins this year he should be canned.
#3 "Young" isn't an excuse. It means the coaching staff sucked at their jobs for years 1-3 and have no players developed to play. Whether it was an error in ability of the player or the character of the player doesn't matter.
#4 We're trending upwards? Rhoads did a better job with Chizik's players than he has with his own. Rhoads walked into some talent which ended up playing on Sundays. Chizik walked into a garbage roster. Chizik went 5-19 with garbage. Rhoads is now 6-18 in his last 24.
Offensively if we come out and hang 30 on OU I'll start to believe we've turned a corner. If we come out and put up 7 points against OU we'll know it was an anomaly.
#5 People are nuts if they think the players love Rhoads. Teams who love their coach don't have to beg to have a "Players Advisory Council" created because they feel their coach is running them into the ground and they aren't ready to play. Do some of them love him? Yes. Do some of them despise him? Yes. Are they ever going to claim they aren't behind their coach? Hell no, that's PT suicide.
In the end, football is binary and Rhoads has had six years to prove himself.You guys can just let go of the "fired" thing...if we lose every game from here on out, there still is no chance of a firing. Nor should there be.
Second, nobody has the same coaching as KSU because nobody else has Snaggletooth. He's a miracle worker. Further, their talent IS better because they've been masters of JUCO recruiting...though that rarely shows up any recruit "ranking" services. Iowa State seems now, belatedly, to be emulating that JUCO approach...and its likely to bear some fruit as early as next year.
Finally, young is an excuse. Whether people have mistakenly used that as an excuse in the past is irrelevant, because even a peawit can see that it IS a factor on this current team. Mistakes were made in recruiting and staff 2-3 years past, but the past two classes are improvements...and this current class looks even better. So while our youth IS the result of shortcomings from the staff, and Rhoads in particular, his willingness to adjust and fix those is PRECISELY what we need from a young coach. He LEARNS from mistakes, a rare quality among human beings.
Also, nobody is an apologist "regardless of the results", we just are willing/able to look deeper than a simple score. A child can look at a win-loss column, and the same child can see nothing else.
Rhoads needs to get us to a bowl next year. That is the bar, you can pretend its higher than that but you'd be fooling yourself. Winning it would great, and I hope/expect that we will...but it is not a requirement for him to continue as our coach.
How many more years in a row are we going to have a "young team?"
Annually. :smile:
But Mccarney. Who we going to hire that's better. 6-19 isn't that bad when you consider the 3 losing seasons of the first 4.Or, at least that's the annual excuse. We could have a starting lineup of nothing but juniors and seniors and the excuse for losing will still be "It's a young team - wait until next year!"
"We've never won in the past so we shouldn't expect to win ever." Such the losers' mentality. It's amazing it doesn't carry over to basketball.
This is exactly why ISU is in a tough position, if you fire Rhoads who do you hire? You start all over again and the odds strongly favor the next guy not doing any better.
In the end, football is binary and Rhoads has had 110 years to prove himself.
#1 If we somehow go 4-1 to finish the year Rhoads is off the hot seat until 2016.
#2 If we finish with 2 or 3 wins this year he should be canned.
#3 "Young" isn't an excuse. It means the coaching staff sucked at their jobs for years 1-3 and have no players developed to play. Whether it was an error in ability of the player or the character of the player doesn't matter.
#4 We're trending upwards? Rhoads did a better job with Chizik's players than he has with his own. Rhoads walked into some talent which ended up playing on Sundays. Chizik walked into a garbage roster. Chizik went 5-19 with garbage. Rhoads is now 6-18 in his last 24.
Offensively if we come out and hang 30 on OU I'll start to believe we've turned a corner. If we come out and put up 7 points against OU we'll know it was an anomaly.
#5 People are nuts if they think the players love Rhoads. Teams who love their coach don't have to beg to have a "Players Advisory Council" created because they feel their coach is running them into the ground and they aren't ready to play. Do some of them love him? Yes. Do some of them despise him? Yes. Are they ever going to claim they aren't behind their coach? Hell no, that's PT suicide.
Good grief.
JP is going to do whatever he feels needs to be done coaching-wise with the football program and as long as ticket sales and facilities and recruiting are on the upswing, and each of those is, CPR will continue to be the head coach.
We certainly have better and more talent on both sides of the ball than we've had whether or not you choose to believe it. We are in the process of establishing depth and that is what is hurting us now.
Call me a sucker, but I'm seeing the method behind the madness after hanging 45 pts off a TX team that has allowed a total of 51 points on the season. That is hella good! Our defense caved in the end, but made some great plays throughout the game. Some of you thick-headed peeps need to step away from your pride and CHOOSE to see the improvement because it is very evident.
I get it that we need to see W's and being content with where we are is foolish. That's an easy no brainer as I am one who wants to see W's as much as anyone. They will come and asking for more patience is not wise, but it is necessary.
With two weeks to prepare, I am starting to think we actually have a shot at OU if this team can put four quarters together. It seems to me we are getting closer to doing that.
This team does not quit and keeps playing hard.
The Chizik Myth about great recruits and stuff is pretty much garbage. Chizik inherited Bret Meyer and Todd Blythe. And Chizik also inherited Austen Arnaud and Alexander Robinson. The Quarterback that Chizik recruited was Jerome Tiller. So spare me the BS that Chizik was a great recruiter. Chizik had some players that were very good like KO, and Leonard Johnson and Benton. But he had a lot of busts as well.
In Rhoads first year the schedule did not have Oklahoma, Texas or Texas Tech. Easier schedule.
There's no Chizik myth about great recruits. The story has more to do with how many games Rhoads won with Chizik recruits versus how many games he won when all Chizik recruits were gone.
So call it the Rhoads Myth.In Rhoads first year the schedule did not have Oklahoma, Texas or Texas Tech. Easier schedule.