But your argument is stupid. As of yesterday, we had the resume of a #6 team. No one is arguing that Iowa State should be in the playoffs right now. Hell most of us won't be mad if we win and don't make the playoffs. Rece's argument is that Iowa State doesn't belong where they are right now. He's bitched for 3 weeks straight (when I started paying attention) that Iowa State is over rated and there's no way that a number of teams shouldn't be ahead of us. And that's just a crap argument. I think that is an interesting discussion and I'll say that the committee has been fair with us. But he's not having an intellectual discussion over several teams that could be ranked from 5-10. He's flat out saying that there's no way we should be 9 or 7 or 6.
He would lose his ******* mind if we got to #4. I mean the coronary might kill him. And if he was simply making the argument that no matter what we do on Saturday and no matter what else happens on Saturday, we shouldn't be in the playoffs, that's cool with me. But when he argues that we shouldn't be top 10 or hell top 15, then that's where we have a problem.
He has ISU at 9 in his AP. He has Coastal, Cincy and Indiana above ISU.
Of course having Indiana above ISU proves he's a ******* moron. Indiana's resume:
- Benefit from a blown call to beat awful PSU in OT
- Have a backdoor cover to get close to OSU after OSU got bored and Day made some terrible decisions to get cute and go for it rather than put the game away by kicking FGs
- Beat 5 teams with losing records.
Indiana is a fraud. A complete fraud. WVU is better than any team Indiana beat. While ISU was dismantling a decent WVU team, Indiana was in dogfights with bad Maryland and Wisconsin teams.
