Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the SEC has apparently been discussing 9 game conference schedules.
There's no assurance that 12 teams = 8 game schedule.
I still can't believe this thread is going... Haven't you guys beat the entire subject to death yet? Jesus
It's the thread that never ends.I still can't believe this thread is going... Haven't you guys beat the entire subject to death yet? Jesus
Yes it goes on and on my friend...
Exactly. I think people on here have faulty assumptions that 12 team league = 8 conference games.
Pac 12 = 9 conf. games
Big 10 = 9 conf. games in 2017
ACC = going to 9 conf games
Big East will almost assuredly go to 9 conference games to squeeze out as much TV revenue as possible to remain competitive revenue wise with other BCS conferences
The only conference that says they're not going to 9 conference games is the SEC with 14 teams. They'll have 6 division games, 1 protected rivalry, and will play each of the remaining 6 teams at home once every 12 years.
I'd be really interested to see how much revenue difference there would be in going to 12 with Louisville and BYU as opposed to going to 12 with our 2 lost schools of A&M/Mizzou. I agree with Nienas that if you're going to expand that it has to be quality, but how much quality difference is there in someone like Louisville vs. someone like Illinois (just to throw a name out there).
If all the other major conferences go to nine games it's not as big of a deal for the Big 12 to do it. What you would see then, is 4-5 more MAC/CUSA/WAC/MWC/SunBelt teams in bowls every season than you do now.
If all the other major conferences go to nine games it's not as big of a deal for the Big 12 to do it. What you would see then, is 4-5 more MAC/CUSA/WAC/MWC/SunBelt teams in bowls every season than you do now.
An unintended consequence of all the big conferences going to nine games could be the loss of some non-BCS programs. That is around 70 less payout games available for MAC/CUSA/WAC/MWC/SunBelt teams that depend on the check from being sacrificial lambs a few times a season to fund their programs. With 9 confrence games most schools will have one FCS tune-up, one game against a BCS school from another conference, and just one paycheck game with a non-BCS school rather than the two they have now.
Which is why at some point, with everyone going to 9 games, you might have to see the postseason eligibility criteria revised. 6-6 is a pretty arbitrary number that tells you nothing about how good a team is. 6-6 in the b12 or SEC is a much better team than 6-6 in the big 10, PAC, or other conferences.
Actually, I think you're going to see a lot fewer intra-BCS conference games as a result of this. A lot of schools are going to need the three sacrificial lambs to even have a shot at making a bowl game (or improving their stock) and thus can't risk the loss to a higher quality opponent. The Cy-Hawk Game could become a rarity in college football, if we don't see the termination of it altogether.
I think if Iowa and ISU are both playing 9 conference games, and 6 wins is still the post season bar, both programs would favor some kind of 2, 3 or 4 year rotation, but not ending it altogether.
Is there any real reason the series couldn't become regularly scheduled, but not every year?