Some comments from Sage

My guess is the structure would essentially look like this. Adding to the cosmetics of the Jake.
file3_m4nodu.jpg
 
I remember reading something where Pollard mentioned building a concourse to connect the east and west on the north side and that it would be incorporated into offices.
He did say something about that. Said concourse connecting east/west stands would go over and look down into Jacobsen building.
 
Should the Jacobsen building be torn down?

NEZ clean canvas?

I don't think so. I think it could easily be added on to with wings going east/west connecting concourses, and seats added in front bowling in the whole north end.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FinalFourCy
Any plans I've heard about have involved the Olsen building being razed, but not the Jackobson building.

There are kind of three aspects I believe, that could be done separately or combined.
1. Athletic performance and office building in the current footprint of the Olsen building.
2. Connecting the concourse through the Jackobsen building.
3. Permanent seating where the hillsides are currently.
 
I watched a bit of OU/TT Saturday night and Tech certainly seemed to have much more freedom with the football than the previous week.
That’s not a conference culture thing, it’s a Mike Stoops thing.

The next project is the new performance center which may or may not include FB offices. If it does, the offices in the new Berg building are likely converted into the players lounge. The talk had been putting this performance center in the parking lot between the Berg and the Jacobson Bldg. Next is the demolition of the Olsen Bldg which a new building is then built on that spot several stories high possibly-No idea how tall tho.... I have mentioned how I would like to see it terraced back to match the new NEZ hillsides (which will continue to exist). If a NEZ features seating, it would be similar to the SEZ balcony but slightly fewer seats due to the angle of the NEZ being more narrow than the SEZ was. If seating was added, you are around 66,000 capacity or so
I’m with you- Imo it would be a big missed opportunity to not enhance the NEZ while doing the next project (performance center) in the area already. Why not keep the Olsen and add structures on each side of the Jake, integrating all into a NEZ? More expensive upfront, but cheaper overall. I’m a dreamer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Land Shark
Discussed but details are always kept quite. Honestly, Sage shouldn't be the one speaking in-depth on this.

Since he is in contact with Pollard frequently, it wouldn't surprise me that he actually is saying things about retaining Campbell to calm fans fears that Pollard feels he shouldn't say himself.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: khardbored
My guess is the structure would essentially look like this. Adding to the cosmetics of the Jake.
file3_m4nodu.jpg
look how steep the lower deck is on Arkansas stadium. With Jack Trice had a steeper incline on the lower deck. It would put the upper deck closer to the field and make it a more intimidating environment. For an engineering school, they did mess this part up (yeah, I know the engineering school didn't design the stadium). The interesting thing is they took all of the design flaws of Jack Trice Stadium and corrected them with West Virginia's stadium
 
I don't understand how you can connect the NEZ concourse without demolishing the Jacobson...

yeah it would seem the Jacobson Building would be in the way of anything they would try to do in the NEZ. It's an ugly building anyway, especially to have it plopped down in our end zone. It doesn't look like it should be part of a football stadium.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron