***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to several blogs/tweets I've read, FSU's preference is 1) Keep ACC intact with better TV deal; 2) SEC 3) B10 and 4) B12

#1 likely won't happen without ND

#2 - Due to new SEC Network, SEC prefers expansion outside of current footprint, likely with UNC and VPI

#3 - FSU is not AAU and it doesn't appear B10 will bend on that (Nebraska was AAU when invited by B10 otherwise they don't get in).

#4 - By default, B12 is likely destination if ND doesn't join ACC as full member or if ESPN doesn't re-do ACC TV deal without ND.

I think Florida has issues with adding FSU to the SEC.
 
Holy **** that would likely be disastrous. That is akin to being down by 5 with two minutes left and hoping it comes down to a Hail Mary. Sure you could win, but the odds are not in your favor.

Very weak and risky assumptions as to: 1.) how the Big 12 would react. Very possible that is not how programs divide. 2.) 16 team conferences that would have more influence and make more money than the Big 12 working poorly 3.) If you think the remaining Big 12 teams would be free-agents after the GoR, meaning conferences beyond 16, why assume there would be enough schools left to hold up the GoR initially? Even if the unlikely happened and the GoR did hold up, good luck finding coaches and recruits wanting to be in a crappy 5 team conference.

The other 4 conferences first reaching 16 would be the death of the Big 12 conference, and the Big 12 schools not part of the initial expansion. The only way that would be good for ISU is if the Big 10's estrogen spiked and tossed us a life-raft while on the way to pick-up KU to reach 20 (while being at the same the other schools leave).

no way this happens ever... why would 4 teams ever leave and risk losing everything or better yet why would a conference take a team with no value. And show me where it says a GOR could EVER be dissolved. The conference owns the rights as long as the confrence has members which they would they would still own these 10 teams media rights. If 4 or 5 teams left which they would just add new members nor would others take them wiith no value but if they did for some amazingly unconcievable reason even then the remaining 5 or 6 would be loaded for 10 years looking for a few friends to share there loot with...this wouldand not cause ahe chain reaction and soa what if it did. ISU ksu baylor then could invite some big east12 folks and woulda be thein richest 10 schoolsthe for the next 10 years..of course none of this would EVER happen. Big 12 isnt going anywhere. We are stable. If we expand it should only be to increase our value, our brand and our chance of winning chapionships. The case can be made for all the but the stability argument just doesn't add up.
 
Im back to the point that i'll believe it when i see it from somewhere above blogger status. Even a radio station at this point. I believe the big 10 will expand again. Enough administrators have been blatantly open that 16 is better than 14 that i think it'll go that way. But it may not be this year. It may be a couple years. The SEC will likely do the same, but again, it may be a process. I don't feel like it is imminent. I think everyone is going to want to see how that 50mil holds up in court before any more ACC moves are made.

I also continue to believe MHVer3 is completely full of ****, though he's good for entertainment value. I think he's claimed to have sources in just about every university, up to and including the university of phoenix. Thedude of WV i think gets some information (almost all from WV sources), but most is out of context and some is misinformation. He applies his own interpretation of what he gets and thats where things often go wrong for him.

With expansion I dont think its about time as much it's about other ACC schools want to see what happens with Maryland. I agree it will happen at some point, If you mean expansion won't happen the rest of this calendar year then yea maybe but if you dont think anymore expansion for a whole 12 to 24 months...I doubt it...HIGHLY

With these WVU guys and expansion...I don't think they are just making this stuff up completely. I think they may know someone that knows someone that knows someone or something like that. I think they hear something that MAY happen, want it to happen so much and be the first to "call" it, they sell it like its a fact. They were so sure that expansion was going to happen this past week, you would have thought they were sitting at the negotiating table. I never really put a ton of trust in them but I'd be a liar if I said I wasn't watching like a ....eagle (I know I'm corny, but I wont say that other bird). Either way I wont put any weight in what they have to say anymore, entrainment is exactly what it is!
 
And show me where it says a GOR could EVER be dissolved.

Can you show me where it says the Big 12 GOR can't be dissolved. Have you read the Big 12 GOR? Is the GOR available somewhere where we can read it? The last time I checked the Big 12 handbook, it had not been updated with the GOR.

If you have read the GOR, what kind of language and provisions does it contain that would prevent it from being dissolved?

If you haven't read it, why are you so sure it can't be dissolved?
 
I would think some good lawyers could wiggle out of a GOR. Something signed for 13 years may not stand up in court.
 
I would think some good lawyers could wiggle out of a GOR. Something signed for 13 years may not stand up in court.

Well if that ever does happen, it will set precedent and make every other conference's GOR useless as well. By then it might be too late for a school like ISU though.
 
I would think some good lawyers could wiggle out of a GOR. Something signed for 13 years may not stand up in court.

The Grant of Rights is a lot different than a punitive $XX million dollar exit fee. It is property rights, and unless they are wanting to build a highway through your backyard the courts generally don't screw around with property rights.
 
Im back to the point that i'll believe it when i see it from somewhere above blogger status. Even a radio station at this point. I believe the big 10 will expand again. Enough administrators have been blatantly open that 16 is better than 14 that i think it'll go that way. But it may not be this year. It may be a couple years. The SEC will likely do the same, but again, it may be a process. I don't feel like it is imminent. I think everyone is going to want to see how that 50mil holds up in court before any more ACC moves are made.

I also continue to believe MHVer3 is completely full of ****, though he's good for entertainment value. I think he's claimed to have sources in just about every university, up to and including the university of phoenix. Thedude of WV i think gets some information (almost all from WV sources), but most is out of context and some is misinformation. He applies his own interpretation of what he gets and thats where things often go wrong for him.

14 is such a terrible scheduling number that I don't believe any school does it unless they have every intention on getting to 16. 16 is also the last manageable number for scheduling unless the intention is more or less a conference split. I think conferences are holding at 14 because they know all the dominoes fall once one league goes to 16--they will have no more available slots to hold for those dreaming of a potential bid.

Both the Big Ten and SEC will probably sit at 14, as unworkable as it is, until they know they have secured the parties they want. The Big 12 is not in a position to do anything, as long as teams we would like to bring in have the option of going to either other conference for the extra cash or the desired proximity they would provide.

I think the ACC hangs on by the skin of its teeth until two of the true football schools move elsewhere, then Katy bar the door. I assume B1G will be the one to do it, they have always been the aggressor in this process. But I worry that their true choice is ND, and they are likely to be the last domino, not the first.

So we are stuck. Much as I hoped this stuff would wrap up over this off season, we might be dealing with it for a couple years like this. That said, once I click the "post" button, it is just as likely to occur in the next 48 hours. So there you have it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyfanatic
I would think some good lawyers could wiggle out of a GOR. Something signed for 13 years may not stand up in court.

I should see if I can get some good lawyers to try and wiggle me out of my mortgage. After all, something signed for 13+ years may not stand up in court.
 
I don't think until Maryland suit is delt with will anyone move. both the sec and big 10 have said 14 is a scheduling nightmare. That said i wouldn't be shocked if the first move would be the B12 getting to 12 if Maryland doesn't have to pay to full 50 million. After that it will be interesting as if the SEC hold to form and doesn't take a team from a state that already has one that likely puts them looking at NCST and VT. The B1G wants AAU schools that has them looking at UVA, UNC and GT.
 
I think that whoever makes the first move if thats B1G,SEC Big12 or Pac 12 it will be a move that people may have seen but the timing will be surprising
 
I would think some good lawyers could wiggle out of a GOR. Something signed for 13 years may not stand up in court.


So could just stop paying my mortgage (since it's for more than 13 years) since it would never stand up in court.

:jimlad:
 
How the hell would you do the playoffs with only 3 conferences and two divisions of 10 teams each? That makes 6 teams. Would there be "wildcards" to bring it to 8? Would 2 teams get a "bye" and the other 4 have a play in game?

Seems messier with this model than the 4x16.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron