Yeah, because 1999 OSU=2009 OSU. :biglaugh: That is a ridiculous statement. Like I said Ace000087= lazy no analysis.Teams are always changing. You have to look at current trends more then something that happened 10 years ago. aTm looks to be on the upswing while TT may be on the downswing. OSU is freaking hot and is a better team than OU. Still doesn't matter...we were 1-2 against the South this year. We could very well be 1-2 against the South next year. So tell me how picking up OU and Texas makes one bit of difference. It doesn't. Nada, zip zero.Please... if anything you are making some extravagant assumptions on future teams performance. Looking at ISU's performance vs the 4 teams, UT, OU, A&M, and OSU since Big12 play was formed:
1996 - Big12 ISU vs (record, points forced, allowed):
UT 0-6, 120 PF - 252 PA
OU 0-6, 50 PF - 201 PA
A&M 1-5, 146 PF - 231 PA
OSU 3-4, 163 PF - 194 PA
Its pretty obvious that based off ISU's past performance vs those teams that ISU fares better off against A&M and OSU. Granted, things can change in conference play, but until OSU beats OU on a regular basis, and A&M beats the cr@p out of Texas, I will stick to my guns on this one.
That good enough? I can keep going...
Utah is the only thing that really changes our schedule. It is a tough game but they lose 12 starters next year. 5 on offense and 7 on defense and the game is early and at home. Where as we lose very little. You just never know how teams like Utah will be in a year or two. Schedule those teams while they are hot and most likely you get them in down time.
The home and away sets up better next year as well. Even KSU at Arrowhead. If you were talking two years from now I would agree with you. The home and away sets up horribly two years from now.
Last edited: