Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.
And I'm dating Kate Upton
nice troll attempt tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.
Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.
Okay the recruting class they had two years ago. I don't think Fran is strong in recruiting, just strong in coaching and putting the kids through basically military boot camp.
I can't presume to talk for Fred but are you sure he was that interested in a brittle, 5' 10" shooting guard?
I also heard Woodbury showed up here decked out in Hok stuff. Get back on the bus son, interview is over.[/QUOTE]
Best shooter in the nation? It's lucca staiger all over again.
Peter Jok shot better than Matt Thomas from the field, the free throw line, and the three point line. Both played against similar competition. Seems pretty clear to me.
Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.
Also has two knees.I don't think this is that outlandish of a statement. They both can really shoot. That being said, I think it's likely that Thomas is a better ballhandler, will be able to defend better on the perimeter, and will be as good as or better a rebounder than Jok.
I don't think this is that outlandish of a statement. They both can really shoot. That being said, I think it's likely that Thomas is a better ballhandler, will be able to defend better on the perimeter, and will be as good as or better a rebounder than Jok.
Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.
Wow. That's straight-up stupid right there.
Matt Thomas has all the national attention that Jok never dreamed of, all for being one of the best (if not the best) shooter in this class.
The numbers don't lie. For Jok to shoot over 90% from the line and 40% from downtown, with the volume of shots he takes, is the mark of a great shooter. Thomas is undoubtedly good, but he is no Peter Jok.
He hasn't proved to be strong in coaching either.
I'm a little drunk but if you want to discuss how great Peter Jok is how bout you got discuss it with the 3 other posters on hawkeyenation.
Year 1 - 11-20 (4-14); 10th in B1G
Year 2 - 18-17 (8-10); 7th in B1G; NIT 2nd rd.
Year 3 - 25-13 (9-9); 6th in B1G; NIT runner up
He's charged with bringing a program back from the abyss in a pretty tough conference <insert jab about Iowa conference SOS here>. Still ton of work to do, <insert NIT joke here>, with a bunch of unathletic gingers and injury-riddled WDM Valley shooter wannabes. But I'll take the results he's delivered so far.
The numbers don't lie. For Jok to shoot over 90% from the line and 40% from downtown, with the volume of shots he takes, is the mark of a great shooter. Thomas is undoubtedly good, but he is no Peter Jok.
You are lucky my 500 character limit is up or this would be added to the signature. Obsurd!Peter Jok is a better shooter than Matt Thomas is.