Iowa/MSU

Putting Jok in the same sentence as the best shooter in NBA history.

You can't make this stuff up, folks.

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Peter Jok is a terrible shooter, but Steph Curry is the best ever. I just put Jok in the same sentence as Curry again, yet the meaning of that sentence isn't even remotely the same. I specifically said Jok is not Curry and is more streaky than anything. My only point was that going strictly by shooting percentage doesn't tell the whole story.
 
Teams game plan their whole defense around stopping Jok like they did with Curry. Iowa fans rag on Matt Thomas and praise Jok like he's an elite deep threat but Matt is a better shooter

This is absolutely fair, and I agree completely.
 
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Peter Jok is a terrible shooter, but Steph Curry is the best ever. I just put Jok in the same sentence as Curry again, yet the meaning of that sentence isn't even remotely the same. I specifically said Jok is not Curry and is more streaky than anything. My only point was that going strictly by shooting percentage doesn't tell the whole story.

Great. Now we know that Jok isn't Steph Curry. Thank god we got that debate taken care of.
 
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Peter Jok is a terrible shooter, but Steph Curry is the best ever. I just put Jok in the same sentence as Curry again, yet the meaning of that sentence isn't even remotely the same. I specifically said Jok is not Curry and is more streaky than anything. My only point was that going strictly by shooting percentage doesn't tell the whole story.

Jok gets a ton of clean looks and he's got a big enough sample size to show his shooting percentage tells the whole story
 
Jok gets a ton of clean looks and he's got a big enough sample size to show his shooting percentage tells the whole story

And I'm not disagreeing with you. But just stating his shooting percentage without providing that context doesn't say a whole lot. Without context, his performance would be comparable to Curry's junior year (I'm well aware that would be a ridiculous statement, which is why I used Curry's junior year to make my point).
 
Last edited:
And I'm not disagreeing with you. But just stating his shooting percentage without providing that context doesn't say a whole lot. Without context, his performance would be comparable to Curry's junior year (I'm well aware that would be a ridiculous statement, which is why I used Curry's junior year to make my point).

Curry being a 38% shooter as a junior needs context of why it's that way. He was constantly the focus of opposing defenses and I'm guessing he shot better every other year. Jok is a career 34 or 35% shooter. Nothing more nothing less. He can get hot but he's too inconsistent to be a great shooter. No context is needed when mentioning his stats because they reflect his true abilities
 
And I'm not disagreeing with you. But just stating his shooting percentage without providing that context doesn't say a whole lot. Without context, his performance would be compara
ble to Curry's junior year (I'm well aware that would be a ridiculous statement, which is why I used Curry's junior year to make my point).

Hey I'm too lazy to look it up, but can you find the thread where you said UNI was a 4 seed? Just wanted to go over that prediction and pick your brain a little bit. I'm always interested in what a genius has to say.
 
Hey I'm too lazy to look it up, but can you find the thread where you said UNI was a 4 seed? Just wanted to go over that prediction and pick your brain a little bit. I'm always interested in what a genius has to say.


common thought on this board after the Iowa state UNI game.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron