The 3 coaches (I'll just assume KF was one) gave that recommendation because they felt he was not guilty of rape. The judicial system also determined he was not guilty of rape.
If they felt he was guilty he would not have been given the recommendation. Why would they risk a media backlash just to help some kid get on another football team unless they really felt that way? If KF is as Machiavellian as you believe, what purpose would that serve?
Ask DJK and the NFL GMs that asked KF about him. He became persona non grata after his embarrassing arrest for drugs. I'm not saying he was a guaranteed future NFL star, but he definitely would have been drafted by someone if KF went to bat for him like he did with Clayborn's N-word cabbie slap.
Now, I know I'm not going to convince you otherwise because it's just easier for so many people over here to believe Ferentz is some sort of Dark Lord of the East or something, but do you really think KF is not ok with drugs, but is ok with rape? Do you really think he is as morally reprehensible as Randy Brown?
Really?
EDIT: Just for the record, I stopped attending basketball games in protest when Alford let Pierre P. back on the team after his red-shirt-assisted one year 'suspension' and did not attend another until he was gone. These 2 guys never played again for Iowa, which means KF did exactly what he should have done.
If you choose to ignore the facts then fine. I am not saying that he covered anything up. I am saying that he gave a couple rapists (and say what you want, they are rapists one admitted to as much for a plea bargain) a recommendation. Again, there was another article out there, I believe from a smaller newspaper that Tepper went into greater detail. At the time of the event, and the recommendation, the girl had confided in many u of i officials that she was raped(including kf). Many u of i officials(including kf), encouraged her not to report it to police but to report it internally. Football players continued to harrass the girl. Those are the facts. You can read them in the report if you want to. The u of i screwed up and they handled it wrong. They admit as much so I am not sure why you can't.
If you think that the staff thought they were innocent,and that was why they gave the recommendation then why did they suspend them? Why encourage them to transfer? Correct me if I am wrong but they never actually kicked them off the team, the two POS just transferred. Why not try and keep them on the team if they did nothing wrong? Either they thought they did something wrong and wanted them gone or they thought they were innocent and then there was no reason to suspend them or have them transfer. We know kf has no issue letting the court system play out and allowing kids to continue playing, so why not let them play if he felt they were innocent?
What media backlash risk are you talking about? That is hilarious. Have you ever seen any backlash from the media for the staff giving these two a recommendation? Heck you didn't even know about it and had to have me provide a link. Yeah, kf was worried about media backlash when he gave these guys a reccommendation. that is freakig hilarious. The local media never ever gives kf any backlash and until the rhabdo incident, neither did the national media. Media backlash...at least you are living up to the first part of your name.
I don't really care how kf has handled everything else. I will give hok fans crap about it just for giggles because I think it is funny. Really the whole scene in iowa ****** is the same. The football player issues are more a reflection of the envirnonment than anything. It is a party school and with a party school come alcohol and drug arrests. I don't think kf is the Dark Lord of the east...blah, blah, blah. How kf and the u of i handled the rape was disgusting. The investigation showed they screwed up, they admitted they screwed up. Encouraging a girl not to report a rape, just to protect a couple of POS makes you a POS in my mind. kirk frerentz is a POS for how he handled the rape. You can choose to ignore what the investigation found you can choose to ignore the facts. I know that ferentz is a POS. I say that as a father of two daughters and a guy that dated a girl that was raped. I understand the long time affects. Think about this...is that girl still attending the u of i? Is she still running track there? Or has her life forever been changed? Did she have to see here attackers everyday because the u of i didn't report the rape? Did she have to take verbal abuse from football players because nothing was done? Those are all things you can read in the u of i investigation. I suggest you read it as it might open your eyes.
As far as Randy Brown...is he still a coach at ISU? I think Brown is a POS as well. Sick bastard. Thing is he never coached a day at ISU after he was vetted. It isn't like ISU officials knew about what he was doing and turned a blind eye and unless, they were to really dive into one's personal life, there is no way they could find out. In the end, he resigned(forced) and was gone.
And no, you won't convince me that ferentz is not a POS. It is obvious that I am more well read on how the rape incident was handled then you are considering you were missing some very important facts.
As far as DJK, the DJK/ferentz relationship was rocky before the drug arrest. That has been documented. djk has said as much.
And yes, I think kf is as morally reprehensible as Randy Brown. You see I have no issue admitting Randy Brown is a POS. His actions have proven as much. So have ferentz's actions.