Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would really be interested in their contract with the record company. Why wouldn't he be suing Geffen over this? Isn't it up to the record company to make sure that there is consent for all the art work on the album cover?When I read the story yesterday, my reaction was 'He's only asking for $150k?' I am not sure how wealthy the members of Nirvana are, but to me, it would seem they would settle for that much and have the person sign a consent for the picture (if one doesn't exist).
To quote @dahliaclone’s opening statement in this thread “THIS is stupid”. At least get the name right. Beyond that, there are far more overrated (it’s one word; not two) musicians than Kurt Cobain.And Kirk Kobane is the most over rated musician of all time.
I believe statute of limitations only applies to certain criminal offenses not civil cases.Isn’t this past the statutes of limitations? Most things are like 5/7/10 years (outside of the really serious stuff) to my knowledge.
I would fine him a couple grand and give it to the band since he has been promoting himself as the baby over the years.If I was on the jury I would say "not a dime"
Isn’t this past the statutes of limitations? Most things are like 5/7/10 years (outside of the really serious stuff) to my knowledge.
When I read the story yesterday, my reaction was 'He's only asking for $150k?' I am not sure how wealthy the members of Nirvana are, but to me, it would seem they would settle for that much and have the person sign a consent for the picture (if one doesn't exist).
He's asking for well over a million dollars. Probably close to $2 million. He wants $150k from each defendant, including Nirvana's former drummer that wasn't a part of the album in question.
There definitely are statutes of limitations in civil cases but I don’t know what they would be in this case.I believe statute of limitations only applies to certain criminal offenses not civil cases.
$1 but he has to jump in a pool to get it.
I think there's an interesting question of should he get a cut because it's a famous album cover and his parents didn't sign off.
But the fact that he is saying this is child pornography is really pissing me off. Because this is not child pornography and the fact that he calls it that minimizes the issue
I believe it was $200I wonder what his parents got for the photo originally.