Baby featured on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album cover is suing the band

His suit is claiming that there was no consent from his parents, or at least no written consent. If there's no record of the consent, it might be problematic, but even so, he's never shown any indication that he was bothered by this before, and has recreated the cover on multiple occasions. Seems like it would be hard to convince people that he has been harmed. That said, you never know what will happen if it goes to a jury. My guess is that it will settle out of court for a trifle, just because neither side wants to take a chance on the jury.

Ah, so the suit relies on the idea that the band just stole the baby for the shoot. Interesting.
 
I think there's an interesting question of should he get a cut because it's a famous album cover and his parents didn't sign off.

But the fact that he is saying this is child pornography is really pissing me off. Because this is not child pornography and the fact that he calls it that minimizes the issue
 
This is stupid.

The suit claims that pairing the nude portrait with a dollar bill on a fish hook makes it look as if Spencer is being depicted “like a sex worker.”


So stupid. No one would even know who is if he hadn't filed a lawsuit. So by publicly declaring who he is, he creates a lawsuit. What if I decide it's me on the cover of the album instead?
 
He's looking for a handout.

Who wouldn't want to be on that cover as a baby. It's the ultimate ice breaker.
 
"Hey, wanna see my baby ****?"

Gets em every time.


sienfield-george.gif
 
When I read the story yesterday, my reaction was 'He's only asking for $150k?' I am not sure how wealthy the members of Nirvana are, but to me, it would seem they would settle for that much and have the person sign a consent for the picture (if one doesn't exist).
 
  • Winner
Reactions: chuckd4735

Help Support Us

Become a patron