It is still a Hawkeye State

This is true, but a couple that they did get called like the holding penalty that wiped out the PI call was rather large mistake. It was not a hold, there was also a helmet to helmet hit in the second half, that went uncalled the Iowa defender led with his helmet right to the head of the ISU ball carrier.
ISU lost because we turned the ball over twice, once in the red zone, lets not stop the talk from Iowa fans how their dline was going to roll the oline of ISU, and how Purdy would be running the entire night from the Iowa Dline. Or the fact that Iowa had players hurt and therefore the reserves were the ones that gave up the long pass plays, and the starters would not have.
You won, take you win and go back to the cesspool of Iowa City, but I am not sure you were the better team, but in the end, it really does not matter.

I wondered why those B1G refs didn't at least stop the game and take a look at that possible targeting on Iowa? The whole crowd was booing and yelling Bull***t after the replay on the video board, so why not at least take a look? In the Alamo Bowl they stopped the game twice to take a look and ejected 2 ISU players.... one a good call, the other total BS.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: criticalobserver
Reading must be difficult for you. Many does not equal most.

You want to look like an idiot, feel free. Its quotes like that that make most of my kids friends (many of whom are D1 football prospects and have the exact hairstyle you mock) never even look at a school like Iowa State. Now given we dont recruit a bunch from New Orleans, but damn if there isnt talent.
Have fun with your overreaction. You said many I said most. Whatever idiot.
 
Has anyone done a wellness check on 1976 and Twins? As well as on their dogs? Little worried there.

Weird game, per usual. Teams looked pretty evenly matched. Surprised ISU's DL didn't get more heat on Stanley, our OL played solid.
Are you asking for a wellness check on someone who you've blocked?

I miss when you were a good poster.
 
How is this funny @HOU_Blue ? Who looked better than them yesterday?

Serious question: what impressed you about Purdy? He did a pretty good job in the RPO game, but otherwise spent all game throwing to wide open receivers because Iowa was playing a super soft zone. When he was asked to make more difficult throws in the second half he couldn’t get the job done.
 
Serious question: what impressed you about Purdy? He did a pretty good job in the RPO game, but otherwise spent all game throwing to wide open receivers because Iowa was playing a super soft zone. When he was asked to make more difficult throws in the second half he couldn’t get the job done.

Are you serious? Don't you love Morehouse by the way?

 
Reading must be difficult for you. Many does not equal most.

You want to look like an idiot, feel free. Its quotes like that that make most of my kids friends (many of whom are D1 football prospects and have the exact hairstyle you mock) never even look at a school like Iowa State. Now given we dont recruit a bunch from New Orleans, but damn if there isnt talent.
Cool story bro
 
Had ISU won 18-17, Iowa fans would be destroying Stanley today and praising Purdy, you can mark that down.

Stanley was way off target on a ton of throws last night, and probably should have had 2-3 INTs. At least two were batted up in the air, but just fell to the ground where nobody was, Rose couldn't hang on to his, and one was just plain dropped in the endzone by ISU right in their hands.

Purdy had better stats than Stanley in every category except for his 1 turnover, but like I said, Stanley could have very easily had several picks.
 
Had ISU won 18-17, Iowa fans would be destroying Stanley today and praising Purdy, you can mark that down.

Stanley was way off target on a ton of throws last night, and probably should have had 2-3 INTs. At least two were batted up in the air, but just fell to the ground where nobody was, Rose couldn't hang on to his, and one was just plain dropped in the endzone by ISU right in their hands.

Purdy had better stats than Stanley in every category except for his 1 turnover, but like I said, Stanley could have very easily had several picks.

If anyone thinks Stanley is a better QB than Brock Purdy they're trolling, incredibly unintelligent or both
 
Thanks for showing everyone exactly the d-baggery we've all become accustomed to from Hawk fans. Just the worst fans in the world.

I've had full beers thrown at me outside of Kinnick, and at Jack Trice I've had Iowa fans yell at my 10 year old son that ISU sucks. Just the best fans in the world right there.

And they wonder why we hope they lose every game.

Georges Niang talks more smack than any fan in this rivalry.

Cook talks smack after Iowa wins in JTS and Clone fan gets butthurt.

I knew you would take this loss harder than most which is bizarre considering you expected ISU to lose.
 
Serious question: what impressed you about Purdy? He did a pretty good job in the RPO game, but otherwise spent all game throwing to wide open receivers because Iowa was playing a super soft zone. When he was asked to make more difficult throws in the second half he couldn’t get the job done.
The announcers mentioned how Nate's deep passes that he routinely misses are being noticed by NFL evaluators.
Brock's a sophomore, is a good QB, and should only get better.
I also think Nate's good but I'm still a little suprised at some of the "easier" passes he still misses after he's been at Iowa this long.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HOU_Blue
This is so true. ISU played a ton of guys in the secondary all night last night.... going 2-3 deep on the depth chart. Probably shouldn't have played a few of them so much, but he was trying to keep guys fresh. Depth is nice to have.

ISU played 10-15 guys in the defensive backfield last night? I call BS.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: criticalobserver
Stanley's brass balls won the game.
tenor.gif
 
Stanley's brass balls won the game.

Nice to have a QB that takes care of the ball and wills his team to a win with his arm and legs on our side.

How can @CyTwins and @JP4CY disagree with this?

One QB stalled out their team with a horrid decision and throw on 4th down in a tight game and also changed the complexion of the game by putting the ball on the ground.

The other made big throws in the second half and made 3-4 plays with his legs in the second half as well that extended scoring drives.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron