what's worse. Getting covid or listening to Boomer Sooner on repeat?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And once again they are taking results from several days and dividing by one days worth of tests. Tell me why they use the Idph site for tests but not for positives. It is a really curious thing they are doing. Using the number of apples for positives and the number of oranges for the amount of tests.
Wouldn't going to bars, the gym to workout or play some sort of sport, or hanging out on campus be added risks as well? Not to mention the fact that you're coming into contact with tons of people outside of your social circle? You then don't get even a sliver to the quality of care and testing the football team does.Because its just farcical to think that its safer. Football only adds risk, it does not reduce it. Massively wishful thinking to assume otherwise. The things you discuss are ways to lessen that added risk, but it still remains an added risk.
I think the confusion stems from how the state releases the numbers. They refer to the “24 hour reporting period “ but have never really explained what that is. The best I can tell is it’s approximately 0900-0900. Then they report the “new positives” and additional deaths. But they don’t break down exactly when any of those actually occurred. It’s pretty dumb.I typically defend the media but this is just weird. The official stats are listed on the coronavirus.iowa.gov website. If those stats are wrong, that's a story, but if they aren't, then those are the numbers.
Wouldn't going to bars, the gym to workout or play some sort of sport, or hanging out on campus be added risks as well? Not to mention the fact that you're coming into contact with tons of people outside of your social circle? You then don't get even a sliver to the quality of care and testing the football team does.
I think the confusion stems from how the state releases the numbers. They refer to the “24 hour reporting period “ but have never really explained what that is. The best I can tell is it’s approximately 0900-0900. Then they report the “new positives” and additional deaths. But they don’t break down exactly when any of those actually occurred. It’s pretty dumb.
Right but I'm not talking about what should and shouldn't be opened. I'm talking about what is currently open, which are bars and restaurants and both things the football players are not allowed to go to. You're not allowed to hang out with people outside the football team nor are you allowed to walk in public without a mask.No one is simultaneously advocating for going to bars while talking about the risk of football. Bars should probably have remained closed, especially in college towns. We also can weigh things on a scale of essentiality, where in any world education is going to be more essential than playing a game. But even then, a massive chunk of classes are online at this point and more and more schools are going entirely that way.
Right but I'm not talking about what should and shouldn't be opened. I'm talking about what is currently open, which are bars and restaurants and both things the football players are not allowed to go to. You're not allowed to hang out with people outside the football team nor are you allowed to walk in public without a mask.
If you're a normal student, the only person keeping you in check is yourself. You don't have to adhere to external rules outside of what the school currently has in place. Not only does the football team have the school rules, but they have the team rules they must follow as well as teammates and coaches that are keeping one another in check.
You throw in the fact that you have some of the best care in the state and yeah, I'm going to go with the football team probably being safer than being in the environment of a regular college student.
Playing the game adds risk, there's no doubt about that. I'm talking about all of the mitigating factors the team is deploying. Those are incredibly more exclusive than what normal college students are doing.You're correct. Playing football probably adds some small level of risk of contracting COVID over not playing. Some people think taking any risk is too much. Some people think playing football is worth it. Either way, due to what's happening within the teams and the testing measures being taken community spread from within a football program seems pretty unlikely.
No one is simultaneously advocating for going to bars while talking about the risk of football. Bars should probably have remained closed, especially in college towns. We also can weigh things on a scale of essentiality, where in any world education is going to be more essential than playing a game. But even then, a massive chunk of classes are online at this point and more and more schools are going entirely that way.
Almost none of which are getting sick.Remind him the spikes in cases in both the U.S. and Europe is largely due to the younger population.
That's a lot of money.


The numbers we’re seeing thrown around only reinforce my belief the whole late winter/spring football season narrative is a fantasy just to keep players from leaving.Like I said, if you don't think this has an effect on the Big Ten you're out of your mind
This isn't going to end the B1G but it's going to effect them in a lot of ways we probably don't even understand.Like I said, if you don't think this has an effect on the Big Ten you're out of your mind
They have no intentions of playing this season no matter when it isThe numbers we’re seeing thrown around only reinforce my belief the whole late winter/spring football season narrative is a fantasy just to keep players from leaving.
Because its just farcical to think that its safer. Football only adds risk, it does not reduce it. Massively wishful thinking to assume otherwise. The things you discuss are ways to lessen that added risk, but it still remains an added risk.