He's not wrong. I love it when a former athlete talks about looking at all that money their making for the school argument.
Ever heard of an unpaid internship? No one is forcing you to play college sports. If you're good enough to get paid by all means go play somewhere that will pay you. You chose to go to the NCAA because you have realized it's the best choice for your future. I chose Iowa State because a 4 year degree led me down a career bath better than going straight into the workforce after high school. It's the same decision.
What's that? You aren't good enough to leave high school and go play pro? So you're kind of benefiting from the facilities and training you're getting in college? Kind of like an unpaid internship. Then there's the fallacy that you're entitled to what you make your company or school. There hasn't been a year since I graduated where I didn't generate way more revenue or cost savings for my employer than I was paid. Believe it or not that's the real world. Then there's the repeated lack of paying attention to the fact that the education is free. Average college student graduates with over $30K in debt. The average cost for room and board for a 4 year institution is over $20K. I guess that 80-100K you get to play sports doesn't count. Also, ask all the PHD candidates how much cash they're rolling in for their breakthroughs.
So I leave it with this suggestion. Strip all athletic scholarships, they pay for tuition and lodging just like every other student. Pay each athlete (no longer student athlete) the average cost of room and board nationwide. Then we can start having a conversation about what their play is worth. Since the athletes that are a part of the APU movement are ignoring the value of the diploma. In the meantime require they maintain good academic standing because the fact that fans have driven up revenue for the athletics departments doesn't change the mission and purpose of the institutions.
And oh by the way...I would go watch ISU play even if there weren't a superstar there slick. Iowa State as a whole is a prime example of this. Over the last 4 years fans have shown up in record numbers for a football team that over that period is under 500. If it was the players making me show and they were being paid to do what they do I'd probably expect to see a hell of a lot more empty seats. Arrowhead stadium isn't selling out when there's been 7 years in a row of .500 football. The idea that it is player talent driving revenue is whack. There were great players in the 70s, that didn't drive up the revenue. The difference has been the media outlets and the advent of technologies like DVR. The only market for live television any more that secures viewers is sports. The DVR, netflix, amazon video, hulu are more responsible for raising the revenue of athletics departments than the players. The overall talent of players hasn't changed dramatically in the last 15 years.