if banks does go down for the year it doesnt concern me that much considering how well LJ and TB played... plus allen bell is there on the depth chart too. still a blow though, he was layin some wood on guys
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Loved Arnaud's poise...he is the starter...he managed the game real well, loved ISU's check with me no huddle...and Bates has to play, too. I think they can both play all season long, and it would be a good thing. Once Bates earns more trust.
DL did well against the run for three quarters, but I would have liked to see them dominate an FCS team more....interior DL's didn't stand out. Back 7 played very good assignment football...was impressed with the discipline of the LB's. SDSU never tested ISU downfield, so that test will come
OL was solid...not much pressure on the QB's at all, which is good. At times, dominated the line in the running game, but would like to see more of that and more consistent...give em a pass, because that first half, with all the craziness, it was hard to get into any sort of flow.
Freshmen...future is bright...
Near perfect first game save turnovers and penalties...still meat on the bone for the coaches to pick off.
Much more tomorrow
I'll start with not 3 fumbles. And not 3 unnecessary roughness penalties. There were a lot of positives to this game, and I love walking away with a big win. But you can't beat Big XII teams with 3 fumbles and bad penalties, so I hope they learn quick.What exactly were you hoping for in the first game with so many new guys seeing playing time.
keep in mind that 86 came on that fluke fumble for a TD, and the 2nd string defense was in a lot of the 2nd halfGood game. Defense bent but did not break, but still giving up like 350 yards is not good. Run defense was great though.
Good game. Defense bent but did not break, but still giving up like 350 yards is not good. Run defense was great though.
I don't know why Banks going down wouldn't concern some people. Yeah, we have CB depth, but some of that depth is true freshman. While they played well tonight, they were also facing guys that they were more talented than. Banks really seems like he could be a playmaker.
I think you're right with regard to the corners. We've still got both starters from last year (Singleton & Bell), our other starter this year (McDowell) and our studly freshman Johnson and Benton. Personally, I was very pleased with LJ's play tonight and suspect we'll see a lot more of him this year.Big blow if its true but it seems as if we have a lot of depth in the secondary.
I think AA is clearly the better overall QB. Bates has some awesome moves, but directing the team and utilizing all the strengths appears to be AA's strength. Bates appeared to me as more of a \"one man\" threat and not the \"team threat\" that AA offers.
I hope Bates accepts the backup role and is open to other positions where we can exploit his strengths. Would be a great 3rd down back (maybe short 3rd down QB), wide receiver, safety, or special teams returner. Also a trick play / decoy.
were we watching the same game. our tackling leaves a lot to be desired 1st team on down. our opponents aquired way more "cyclone" yards than we did.Solid tackling for the most part by the 1st team D.
For the first time in 5 or more years, I was relaxed during field goal attempts. Great to see the field goals all go right down the middle instead of hitting the post, barely making one and missing. Granted, I think the longest was 36 yards, but that was not a gimme in the past.