Isaiah Stokes visiting 9/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
We are going after two bigs Teddy and Stokes if my memory serves me correct. Does everything think we would take the first to commit out of those two and take away the offer for the other one?

Allen committed to WVU, and he's probably a SF. I think he might be listed as a SG in some spots, but I don't see that.
 
The talk with Washington has always been Kentucky. Nothing to do with Crystal Balls.

http://usatodayhss.com/2016/the-p-j-washington-blog-the-kentucky-and-north-carolina-visits-and-more

Kentucky gets a ton of guys but whenever they are recruiting someone people start picking them to Kentucky and say they are the favorites. Could they be? Yeah. Could UNC have changed things? Yes. I don't think you ever really know in these things until right before the announcement and even then sometimes people get bad information.
 
Anyone think Prohm will start visiting Stokes once a week like he was doing with Lindell? I hope we go hard at Stokes now and pitch that we have a top tier point guard to get him the ball
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DurangoCy
Hmmm, sound a little butt hurt. And 07 gave a spot on clear answer. You come in with ambiguous nonsense that could be used in either side of the coin....
Agree. '07 gave info the correct way (no riddles). If somebody had a problem with his/her approach they were just a dingbat. People are judged by their post history whether they like or or not. '07 has clout.
 
Anyone think Prohm will start visiting Stokes once a week like he was doing with Lindell? I hope we go hard at Stokes now and pitch that we have a top tier point guard to get him the ball

I do think they'd have to be careful. They can't say anything specific about recruits until they have a signed letter of intent, at least in the media. I'm not sure how it would work on a recruiting trip.
 
I'm surprised I didn't have to explain that because it was too cryptic for you, like when I literally said "Lard will not play here this year" and you and your followers still complained about it.

I do appreciate some of the comments that you make and believe that you just might have some type of source. But your assertions are almost always two sided and can often be interpreted as opinions.

I think the biggest difference between you and 07 is that he doesn't have to come back on here afterwards having to defend what he said and explain why he was right after all. That's kind of a big difference.
 
I do appreciate some of the comments that you make and believe that you just might have some type of source. But your assertions are almost always two sided and can often be interpreted as opinions.

I think the biggest difference between you and 07 is that he doesn't have to come back on here afterwards having to defend what he said and explain why he was right after all. That's kind of a big difference.


Spot on.

Cyrocks continually has to come on and say "Well thats not what that meant" or "You interpreted that post wrong "

What a joke. Your greatness? Dude...youre a hack on a message board that posts cryptic non commital "info" from a "source". We're laughing at you...not with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron