Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not all cars can run on E-85 though, right?
If you do the math, the difference needs to be around the 20 cents per gallon to get the two close. For E85 the disparity needs to be much greater.
The subsidies won't last forever and ethanol has many other negative impacts (wildlife habitat going by the wayside & potential to inflate some food prices) that it falls into the "joke" category.
Not all cars can run on E-85 though, right?
1. Increase octane without using MTBE
2. Reduce the amount of gasoline we are using
3. Reduce emissions
4. Replace some of our gasoline usage with a fuel that comes from renewable resources (this, obviously, is directly related to #2 above)
The subsidies won't last forever
What wildlife habitats? You forgot to add that it burns cleaner, which is better for the environment. Also, as far as food prices go, the biggest reason food prices are going up is due to transportation costs, which ethanol actually HELPS. Ethanol plants have a "co-product" that still gets fed to cattle, so that argument is not as big as most people think.
Just my opinion, but I'd rather have our government give subsidies to an industry that not only helps the American farmer, but diverts some of the money from going to foreign oil. Ethanol is not the final answer, but it is a start in finding that answer.
cyeah Just an FYI said:It is misinformation like this that drives me crazy. Ethanol is not taking food off the table. There is currently a 1.3 BILLION bushel carry over in corn. The ethanol process removes the starch from the corn. They turn this sugar into ethanol. The remaining protein is fed to livestock. China, India, and the rest of the World are buying our grain at a record pace. The value of our dollar has made the USA the blue light special. We actually have more bushels of corn for livestock, export, food production, etc. than at any other time in recent history. Last year the US raised over 13 billion bushels.
I would say your post is more of a joke than ethanol. Yes, I am biased. If you don't like using it, just keep sending your money out of the Country.
It is misinformation like this that drives me crazy. Ethanol is not taking food off the table. There is currently a 1.3 BILLION bushel carry over in corn. The ethanol process removes the starch from the corn. They turn this sugar into ethanol. The remaining protein is fed to livestock. China, India, and the rest of the World are buying our grain at a record pace. The value of our dollar has made the USA the blue light special. We actually have more bushels of corn for livestock, export, food production, etc. than at any other time in recent history. Last year the US raised over 13 billion bushels.
I would say your post is more of a joke than ethanol. Yes, I am biased. If you don't like using it, just keep sending your money out of the Country.
It is misinformation like this that drives me crazy. Ethanol is not taking food off the table. There is currently a 1.3 BILLION bushel carry over in corn. The ethanol process removes the starch from the corn. They turn this sugar into ethanol. The remaining protein is fed to livestock. China, India, and the rest of the World are buying our grain at a record pace. The value of our dollar has made the USA the blue light special. We actually have more bushels of corn for livestock, export, food production, etc. than at any other time in recent history. Last year the US raised over 13 billion bushels.
I would say your post is more of a joke than ethanol. Yes, I am biased. If you don't like using it, just keep sending your money out of the Country.
the wildlife habitats that every farmer in america is plowing up so they can plant corn. look around. there is hardly any setaside left anymore. yes it burns cleaner, but how much extra pollutants go into the air to make it? a lot of emmisions from the plants i see. food prices are going up because farmers can't afford to feed their livestock corn anymore. it's 6 bucks a bushel and they are losing about 60 bucks a head right now. gluton is the bi-product you speak of and yes it is a cheap method to feed cattle, but you cannot only feed them gluton-it will kill them. i sell livestock and grain trailers for a living so i deal with this stuff on a daily basis. ethanol is not the answer.
The subsidies won't last forever and ethanol has many other negative impacts (wildlife habitat going by the wayside & potential to inflate some food prices) that it falls into the "joke" category.
And your response to issue with declining wildlife populations in Iowa due to the so called "ethanol boom"??
I would like to hear how this comes about..........please humor me story teller.
You mean like the shrinking deer population? I guess ethanol must raise that one. The turkey poulation, no not that one either. It is foolish to point to one thing as the reason for an animal species decline.
Especially when deer, turkey, pheasant or you name it for wildlife thrive in bean and corn fields just as well as any timber.