Why use just athletics to punish the kid? If this is a serious infraction for the school district, then suspend him from school. However, if it's not serious enough for him to miss calculus, then it's not serious enough to bench him either...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why use just athletics to punish the kid? If this is a serious infraction for the school district, then suspend him from school. However, if it's not serious enough for him to miss calculus, then it's not serious enough to bench him either...
Unfortunate timing. I'm not going to lecture because I know what my HS team got into on the weekends. However, if memory serves me correctly, we were pretty well behaved before going into state as a top seed.
Basketball is an extra, a luxury. Just because you don't suspend him doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to take away other things as punishment.
I'm assuming here that basketball is something that he really enjoys. So if you think the crime isn't severe enough to suspend him from school, taking away something else that he enjoys is a logical step in the punishment food chain. What would you suggest, either he's suspended from school or nothing?How are those "other things" determined? There are lots of ways to punish a kid. Again, if he's benched for the state tourney but not suspended from school, then it's just window dressing, that actually punishes his teammates as much as him.
I'm assuming here that basketball is something that he really enjoys. So if you think the crime isn't severe enough to suspend him from school, taking away something else that he enjoys is a logical step in the punishment food chain. What would you suggest, either he's suspended from school or nothing?
I'm assuming here that basketball is something that he really enjoys. So if you think the crime isn't severe enough to suspend him from school, taking away something else that he enjoys is a logical step in the punishment food chain. What would you suggest, either he's suspended from school or nothing?
OUCH Heelan has as many free throws made as New hampton has pointsHeelan up on New Hampton at the half..................34-8
GOOD LORD
So athletics should be higher than school? Righto. Athletics is an extra-curricular activity, emphasis on extra. As clone_12 said, it is a privilege.I'm tired of athletics/activities being the "low-hanging fruit" to punish someone. Yes, if the crime is serious enough, suspend him from everything (including school) or else find some other way to do it. I don't like this hierarchy of punishment where athletics is at the bottom. It's a cop-out.
If a kid gets in trouble, he should be just as concerned about missing a history test as missing a game.
I agree it was one stupid mistake. But having a party with underage drinking at your house makes it your problem, whether you're drinking or not.wxman1 said:Nate's decision was not the best no. However there are a lot of questions left unanswered. Nobody knows if he tried to get the people with the alcohol to leave. He was also not drinking which means he does not have to sit out, this is according to state and school policy. He got cited for having a dissorderly house basically just because it was at his house, if it would have been anywhere else he would have been released with no charges or citation. He is not a bad kid one bad decision does hurt but I assume coach will let him play but not start him. I also think this could have been reported MUCH better. As others have said this happens at every high school and no it does not always get broken up and caught by the police but it happens everywhere, and if you think students and athletes from other schools were not there you would be very wrong.
Exactly, Student athlete, student first athlete second.isunorth said:I think they should do both if they're really pushing the "student athlete" idea.
I think they should do both if they're really pushing the "student athlete" idea.
The fact of the matter is that no high school kid ever gets punished for underage drinking if they're not involved in sports, arts, etc. I went to high school with a bunch of junkies who were always in trouble with the law and nothing ever happened to them at school. What are you going to hold them out of? They don't do anything besides show up to class! However, if you play ball and you get caught at a kegger (gasp!) you're sitting out.
I understand the argument that sports and other activities are a luxury and it's something they like. Who's to say the kid doesn't love calculus? What about the brainy kids who get caught drinking...do we hold them out of AP physics? Make them sit out of the science fair?
Nate's decision was not the best no. However there are a lot of questions left unanswered. Nobody knows if he tried to get the people with the alcohol to leave. He was also not drinking which means he does not have to sit out, this is according to state and school policy. He got cited for having a dissorderly house basically just because it was at his house, if it would have been anywhere else he would have been released with no charges or citation. He is not a bad kid one bad decision does hurt but I assume coach will let him play but not start him. I also think this could have been reported MUCH better. As others have said this happens at every high school and no it does not always get broken up and caught by the police but it happens everywhere, and if you think students and athletes from other schools were not there you would be very wrong.
.
that should be the best game. huge rivals and im from johnston so they will win.I think we all know that the best game in the whole tournament out of any class will be played at 3:30 tomorrow in 4A and not just because i'm a homer alum.