Relying on an account from a media source is laughable at best. The media has lost all credibility IMO.
By his supposed admission of guilt, he must have been out of control. From the description there must be a preponderance of evidence.
I served on a jury and I was amazed how the newspaper report didn't seem like it was the same trial I sat in on. We had an unbelievably diverse jury.
If he's guilty, let him suffer the consequences.
I am surprised someone on here hasn't looked at official reports
I once had (fill in the blank experience); therefore, all experiences are like this. Anyone reporting otherwise cannot be trusted.
The internet in a nutshell.
