Couple weird coaching decisions this gameWhat are you challenging? And why do the tv guys not understand a basic rule. He catches it, isn’t touched and his momentum carries him short of the line. That’s a Zim level dumbass challenge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Couple weird coaching decisions this gameWhat are you challenging? And why do the tv guys not understand a basic rule. He catches it, isn’t touched and his momentum carries him short of the line. That’s a Zim level dumbass challenge.
Stupid play calls here and at the end of the first half vs Buffalo costing them points.Wtf was that play call
Yeah just run it on first down and you either get a TD or make them burn a timeout. Such an obvious choiceWhy would you call that there? Run it up the middle, don't get it, Detroit takes their last timeout. Run it again, don't get it you take the clock down to like 15 seconds.... That was really stupid
Bad coaching half for McConnellStupid play calls here and at the end of the first half vs Buffalo costing them points.
You’re running a compacted box at the 2. There will be tons of pressure and disruption. In fact they are counting to run that dumbass play. It’s one thing if it was 3rd down.Bad play call or not, still have to block, and hang on to the football.
McConnell has been weird todayAs someone who's cheering for the Lions... why the hell are you going for 2 there?
These coaching decisions don't make any sense at all.
Why go for 2?
As someone who's cheering for the Lions... why the hell are you going for 2 there?
These coaching decisions don't make any sense at all.
Just coming to ask that.
It's been a pretty popular decision analytics wise the last couple years, but usually don't see it til the 4th quarter. The thinking is you statistically you have roughly 50/50 shot of converting a 2 point attempt. If you're down 14 and score to get it to 8, go for 2 to cut it to 6 so that if you score again, you only need to kick the XP to go ahead. If you don't get it, obviously you have to get it the second time to tie it up. Basically it's playing to win instead of playing to tie.What the **** is O'Connell doing today.
It's been a pretty popular decision analytics wise the last couple years, but usually don't see it til the 4th quarter. The thinking is you statistically you have roughly 50/50 shot of converting a 2 point attempt. If you're down 14 and score to get it to 8, go for 2 to cut it to 6 so that if you score again, you only need to kick the XP to go ahead. If you don't get it, obviously you have to get it the second time to tie it up. Basically it's playing to win instead of playing to tie.
![]()
Going for 2 down 8 points: Explaining NFL analytics strategy
The Packers profited from being the first team this season to try this unconventional 2-point conversion attempt. Here's why others should follow their lead.www.espn.com