F*CK IOWA

In the eyes of the media, the fan conduct was justified. How dare officials use replay to make the correct call? Iowa still only had to go 20-25 yards with a timeout and 90 seconds to get into field goal range. Funny how nobody is discussing how Iowa failed to take advantage of that field position to get in range for a game winning field goal.

Nope. The refs lost the game for Iowa. Iowa fans act like 4 year olds throwing things onto the field where their own cheer squad take shelter under their signs to protect their heads. And they expect everyone to feel sorry for them.

The only people I feel sorry are the kids at the game who have to witness these actions. They are then likely to behave the same way when they are adults. I’m not saying ISU fans are saints…. But we will just “boo” relentlessly at the officials. That’s far better than throwing objects towards people

The funny thing is this situation for most offenses is very doable. But for Iowa’s offense under BF, it would be the equivalent of having to go 99 yards in 20 seconds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinch and Cyhig
Just in case you’re wondering how eastern Iowa is handling the replay decision even now on Monday morning, there are three - three! - articles in the Gazette highlighting the call. And still referring to it as a “penalty” when that’s not at all what it was.

View attachment 118340View attachment 118341View attachment 118342

This is what happens when you:
*pander to the audience for 40+ years
*are afraid of pissing off the people who control your access
*hire fanboys to serve as beat writers
 
That some serious hawkdumb hillbilly stupidity. Do they just try their hardest to keep themselves uneducated in the land of denial?

Tell me you are the dumbest fan base in America without telling me you are the dumbest fantase in America

They've fully lost their minds. Between this and the one guy claiming it's unfair to take back a really cool play and it should just be a 15 yard penalty tells you all you need to know.

To me, there's good reason for the rule to exist. You put the onus on the defender to not hit someone who has called a fair catch. Heck, you had the play earlier in the game where they got flagged when DeJean stuck his arm out and pushed the defender. But if you are going to require defenders to not hit someone who has called a fair catch, then you have to strictly enforce anything that looks like a fair catch. Otherwise you've really made it unfair to the defending team.
 
What I find funny is that everyone is saying that refs screwed them out of a win. Even if the refs screwed them, they only screwed them out of a 17-12 lead with 1:21 left. There is no guarantee that Iowa wouldn’t have screwed up the last 81 seconds.
Don't throw an interception and Iowa still had a good chance to win the game
 
This is what happens when you:
*pander to the audience for 40+ years
*are afraid of pissing off the people who control your access
*hire fanboys to serve as beat writers
I think a lot of them don’t read and/or understand nuances. I’ve seen a lot of “the hand wasn’t above the shoulders so it shouldn’t have been called a fair catch”, and then when the response is that’s correct, it was an invalid fair catch signal…then they’re like “exactly” (not caring to understand that the net result is same…ball is placed at that spot). And of course the 3rd thing you see is the whole reference to the penalty…and “why didn’t they throw the flag and stop the play if it was a penalty?”.

It’s kind of baffling that you could spend so much time angry at the result and not try to fully understand the why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clonedude
I’ve seen a lot of “That happens all the time and it’s never called.” I don’t agree with that. We see the pointing (which isn’t the invalid fair catch part), but even that is almost always followed by the returner just running away from the ball or at most just falling on it. I don’t recall seeing players wave their arm and then trying to return a punt.

Basically the same call was made here. 1:09:38 mark for the punt return.

 
This. This is the best part too. Literally nothing controversial about it in any way.

Not the waving (or the intention)

Not the “lack of whistle”

Not the replay/review

Perfectly done by the officiating crew. Would have been a MASSIVE screw job for Minny.

The real sh*tty part of this is remembering that we freaking gave up several big plays to Iowa’s unbelievably sh*tty offense. Man, that sucked losing to those turds. Embarrassing really.
Veteran QB with winning experience and some poise/vision probably contributed. That loss definitely sucks, but Iowa is not the same team today that that they were six weeks ago
 
Last edited:
I think a lot of them don’t read and/or understand nuances. I’ve seen a lot of “the hand wasn’t above the shoulders so it shouldn’t have been called a fair catch”, and then when the response is that’s correct, it was an invalid fair catch signal…then they’re like “exactly” (not caring to understand that the net result is same…ball is placed at that spot). And of course the 3rd thing you see is the whole reference to the penalty…and “why didn’t they throw the flag and stop the play if it was a penalty?”.

It’s kind of baffling that you could spend so much time angry at the result and not try to fully understand the why.
that’s because you can’t argue with stupid. :) remember the majority of thei fan base. LOL
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron