Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)


Someone gave me a "creative" but I'm telling you Arizona was looking at B12 before USC/UCLA even left. These #s don't lie to a school who cares about hoops.
 
Hopefully we see some movement after the meeting. Seems like official #s from the PAC was the formality AZ needed before making the switch
 
He has a point. Again…the Buffs, by themselves, mean close to nothing.
If so, then why does Colorado leaving mean so much?

I'm not disagreeing with you that Colorado wasn't successful in football over the last decade, but if they really were bottom of the barrel, no one cared, then them leaving should, at worst, do nothing, and at best strengthen the Pac9 position going forward.
 
Someone gave me a "creative" but I'm telling you Arizona was looking at B12 before USC/UCLA even left. These #s don't lie to a school who cares about hoops.

I mean, rumors of Arizona to the Big 12 have been a thing for close to a decade now. In part I always thought it was mostly our own wishful thinking, but perhaps not.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm
He has a point. Again…the Buffs, by themselves, mean close to nothing.
The takeaway is the conference members are beginning to realize the fragile nature of the conference. If the conference had strong footing, they would have reached a media rights deal long ago. Colorado leaving the conference and rejoining a conference they left 12 or so years ago is a huge statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aauummm
If so, then why does Colorado leaving mean so much?

I'm not disagreeing with you that Colorado wasn't successful in football over the last decade, but if they really were bottom of the barrel, no one cared, then them leaving should, at worst, do nothing, and at best strengthen the Pac9 position going forward.
It means something, in my mind, because it simply can’t be the end. It’s been covered a little bit already (@HoopsTournament covered it briefly). It is impossible to schedule with 13 teams. Not just “hard”, but mathematically impossible, so the Big12 has to add another institution.

The prevailing thought is that institution is Arizona, and Arizona leaving would cripple the PAC. If Arizona doesn’t leave, we’re staring directly at UCONN.

The cards are stacked against the PAC, for sure, but all things being equal, SDSU replacing CU isn’t as far fetched as people think. The problem for the PAC is how much it would cost SDSU to make such a move ($34M exit fee) plus the fact the PAC has, presumably at best, a ****** deal on the table that GK will present tomorrow.
 
Scheer also reporting that no one knows where linear will come from and that a very small portion of it is going to be linear anyway.


Potentially increases in $$ if ratings are hit. How are rating #s going to be when 85% is streaming and 15% linear.
 
I mean, rumors of Arizona to the Big 12 have been a thing for close to a decade now. In part I always thought it was mostly our own wishful thinking, but perhaps not.

IIRC, the Big 12 could’ve had the Arizona schools back in 2016 when that expansion palooza with all those G5 schools was going on. If OuT had been committed it could’ve been done so much sooner than now
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY and Yaz

Help Support Us

Become a patron