Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Ok, you’d view it as a failure.

But, irregardless, we HAVE to add a 14th team. So who’s better SDSU or UConn? SDSU would still hurt the P12 and their backfill attempt.

Or we could go to a 10 game conference schedule I guess.
I don’t think BY would have added CU without knowing AZ or another P5 school was coming. If the only options are those two then you take UConn but damn that would make the football side of the conference look crazy bad.
 
It would be nice to get Nike to be the exclusive brand of the big 12. Then let them do some extra jersey versions and then could have a Nike game of the week (basically similar to the color rush in the nfl)
 
Yes 13 x 9 = 117. You need 2 teams per game. 117 doesn’t divide by 2 without a remainder. So someone would only play 8 games.

So a 14th team needs to be added, hopefully for 2024.
That’s an easy fix. Just call up the Big 10 and ask them to volunteer Iowa to be the ninth conference game for the odd man out. BF could be worst offensive coordinator in two conferences then.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: NWICY
People around here talking About Oregon and Washington like they’re….TEXAS Lol. No matter what Texas has or hasn’t done recently in football they have been and always will be a football blue blood. They are also a HUGE brand. Probably as big as all of the PAC football brands combined. Stop looking at season records from your recent memory, that’s not what any of this is about. If ND went 0-12 for the next 5 years the Big 10 would still murder their own families to get them in that league.
I was thinking of the “next Texas” in the context of always pushing for preferential treatment under the threat of leaving, and often got whatever they wanted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: somecyguy
And if it is UConn and just Colorado that is a failure. The whole reason Colorado is a good add is that it destabilizes the pac. They are not a good program, brand, or ratings draw. The only reason you can even add them is becuase of the amazing contract the commish got with escalators for adding P5 teams. Without those the networks in no way pay full value for CU and that’s going to have to be something to think about for the next deal.
Good lord, we aren’t adding UCONN or any G5’s. Stop with these stupid hypotheticals. Arizona will join the Big12. The only question is if it’s just Arizona and stop at 14, or if Oregon and Washington join and go to 16.
 
Good lord, we aren’t adding UCONN or any G5’s. Stop with these stupid hypotheticals. Arizona will join the Big12. The only question is if it’s just Arizona and stop at 14, or if Oregon and Washington join and go to 16.
I didn’t propose that you know, in fact the opposite…
 
I was thinking of the “next Texas” in the context of always pushing for preferential treatment under the threat of leaving, and often got whatever they wanted.
And Oregon would never get that treatment. Phil Knight may have set up an endowment, as some have said, but the ties to Nike they have now, will eventually end or at least slow down when he passes. Texas is Texas, because of the State of Texas. The State of Oregon will never have that population or media power.
 
It's amazing reading these pac 10 boards.....they all think if you go to the big 12 you are dead, can never get into the big ten or sec....and it's so stupid, the big ten will take you if they want you, being in the big 12 wont stop them....hell, everyone leaves the big 12 if the big guys call... it's the definition of a temporary stay
 
  • Like
Reactions: HouClone
It would be nice to get Nike to be the exclusive brand of the big 12. Then let them do some extra jersey versions and then could have a Nike game of the week (basically similar to the color rush in the nfl)
Don't think the non-Nike schools in the league would be cool with that.
 
I’m really thinking Oregon and Washington are backup plans for the big 10. truly believe they want Notre Dame, Virginia, North Carolina and Stanford first. Not sure for the $ec besides Clemson, Florida State and possibly Virginia Tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclone Pfan
If the P9 stays together, it will have to be UCONN or SDSU. If BY wants UCONN, he knows more about this than the collective intelligence of this entire board.

Neither would be full members. Why so many people don’t understand that is crazy.

CU coming aboard is already a huge win. Huge. If the P10 had hung together, we would have had to listen the their blowhards cackle for the next 5 years that no one wanted the Big 12.

Anything going forward is gravy, even if it is UCONN or SDSU for 2024. We will still hold our three full value expansion slots for the PAC or
What part of my statement is confusing you?
Your "neither will be full members" comment, what does that mean?

AND "even if it is UCONN or SDSU for 2024", what's that mean?

Those 2 comments were confusing.
 
And Oregon would never get that treatment. Phil Knight may have set up an endowment, as some have said, but the ties to Nike they have now, will eventually end or at least slow down when he passes. Texas is Texas, because of the State of Texas. The State of Oregon will never have that population or media power.

It's a good point. Oregon has a touch over 4 million people, which isn't that much larger than Iowa (though I expect that gap to widen as time goes on). Portland is a nice market, but it's no Seattle or Bay Area.

Nike/Knight has been good to them, but people don't realize just how many people and how much money is in Texas. Which is probably hard to grasp when we're approaching it as outsiders.
 
Don't think the non-Nike schools in the league would be cool with that.
According to the podcast, it’s Kansas and one other school, I forget which one (TTech, Under Armor?) that aren’t Nike already. The other schools contract ends after this year. There is obviously Kansas and Adidas and they didn’t know when that ended. Which is odd, since a quick google search shows it through 2031. So, they aren’t getting Kansas.
 
I’m sorry but if this is true then it sounds like you’re trading the texas problem for something much worse. Conference naming rights? Are we serious? If you think the perception of the Big12 is rough right now adding Oregon and immediately allowing them to rename the conference would be the most JV thing I’ve ever seen. The commish has been a rock star so far so I assume he won’t do something this stupid.
Well sure, now that I think about it some more. The idea is out there though now. Whether BY and the Big 12 would allow just this example, who knows? But selling naming rights, even to the Big 12 conference, on a yearly basis, who knows? It goes on every day/year; it's actually very common practice now. It just hasn't been allowed to happen to a collegiate athletic conference, yet. If it makes each member school millions of extra dollars, I don't know how you could not at least consider it. These were just talking heads, you know, talking. It wasn't the only idea they were discussing.

Regardless, the point of it all is that BY is, and is going to continue, exploring new ways to go about business. He will probably be a large player in the think tank that writes the new playoff guidelines and rules, as well. We'll see how much the other conferences, especially the B1G and SEC want to listen to what he might have to say.

After year 1 of Brett Yormark, about all I can say with confidence, is that he hasn't created his Big 12 legacy just yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

Help Support Us

Become a patron