Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

If I am the Big12 I would 100% add those 6 Pac 12 schools.

I would go with 3 scheduling pods (Play 5 teams every year & then rotate other 12 over a 3 year cycle.
  • UA, ASU, BYU, UU, OR, UW
  • ISU, KU, KSU, CU, OSU, (TT or TCU)
  • WVU, UCF, UC, UH, BU, (TT or TCU)
That would minimize travel costs, but still have schools in all 4 time zones
I can see that working out. What happens to the two state schools plus Stanford/cal will be interesting.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CascadeClone
I would guess Yormark has a priority list for both PAC now and ACC future (leftovers in ACC case) and a pretty good idea of who he wants based on going to 16, 20, or 24 total teams.

For example, if he never wants more than 16, he prob would just take 2 PACs, and wait on 2 ACCs. But if he wants 20, then 4 of each. For 24, you need 12 more total, and I don't know if the "last 4 in" would be worth it - you're talking Cal, BC, GT types.

Predicting the future for the 100th time... 4 from the PAC (prob the M4 because B1G will somehow take UW/UO) and 4 from the ACC. 20 teams total from east coast to the desert southwest.

I think he wants to be at 16(right now) just like the SEC and B1G. I also think he would be willing to pass them(for now) going to 18 if the Four Corners+Oregon and Washington all applied for the Big12, knowing that both the B1G and SEC will be raiding the ACC in the next wave and obviously the Big12 picks up more schools then as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone
I feel that Yormark needs to approach ESPN as ask how can the Big12 support ESPN's desire to fill the late night Saturday time slot. Pac12 After Dark has traditionally meant a 9:30p CT kick-off.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: CascadeClone
I think he wants to be at 16(right now) just like the SEC and B1G. I also think he would be willing to pass them(for now) going to 18 if the Four Corners+Oregon and Washington all applied for the Big12, knowing that both the B1G and SEC will be raiding the ACC in the next wave and obviously the Big12 picks up more schools then as well.
Washington going to the Big12 is going to get so much pushback from the state I legit don’t know if it would happen. It makes 100% sense with a big ten invite not coming anytime soon but politically I just don’t know it if would be allowed.
 
Washington going to the Big12 is going to get so much pushback from the state I legit don’t know if it would happen. It makes 100% sense with a big ten invite not coming anytime soon but politically I just don’t know it if would be allowed.
Politics don’t matter in this. We hear this every time there’s a move and they still move.
 
Perfect analogy and yep I agree they fit in well with the big ten’s ideals. Just wish they had a halfway decent football team. Or their basketball team didn’t play a style that makes my eyes bleed

Just watch West Virginia play at home, and then Regular Virginia will look like JLH making out with ScarJo.
 
Politics don’t matter in this. We hear this every time there’s a move and they still move.
We haven’t really seen a politics clash like this. The politics move with UCLA was about leaving cal behind. Outside of that UCLA fits in very well with the big ten. Washington to the big 12 is a totally different animal.
 
Washington going to the Big12 is going to get so much pushback from the state I legit don’t know if it would happen. It makes 100% sense with a big ten invite not coming anytime soon but politically I just don’t know it if would be allowed.
Maybe, but then the Big12 moves on to Cal or Stanford. I doubt UW wants to be in the MWC until 2030 and hoping for a Big10 invite.

A Big12 invite to any Pac12 schools is a 6 year engagement. In 2030 if the Big10 or SEC decide to add ACC or Big12 schools, whether its Oregon, Washington, Kansas or Iowa State they would all jump at the chance.
 
And listening to these old media dinosaurs talk about value of schools and conferences is hilarious. They've been so wrong
Completely agree. Every major end game prediction theyve had has been way off. The Big 10 is about 8 teams lighter than projected. The NCAA is still here and so are all the conferences

The 3 scenarios I think could happen are

Big 10 and SEC stop at 20 because they'll hit diminishing returns. The other is that the top of the Big 10 and SEC

Big 10 and SEC eventually go to war post ACC to raid money schools from each other.

Someone gets in the ear if the elites in both conferences and they leave the to pursue more money, taking a few rivals with them and a few middle-of-the-roaders for 16-20 teams. In the contract is a competitive clause where sustained runs of poor play can lead to teams being removed.
Miami will go to the SEC, and VT will go to the Big 10. I think VT was on the Big 10 short list when Maryland and Rutgers were added.
Was VT? did not know that. Thought UVA may have been. With the appetite for expansion in the Big 10 being seemingly low I think they'll take 2 max. Without knowing the comishs stance its tough to know.

For Miami that ones a pipedream for sure. IDK if the SEC is the move. Clemson and Florida State feel like locks and IDK the SEC, who hasnt doubled dipped in expansion in the last 3 rounds will will want to triple dip in this one.
 
The only problem with that is that the Pac hasn’t really made any inroads with traditional tv service where markets could still matter. So far the only discussion I have really heard of have been with Amazon and other streamers.
It definitely seems like the PACs option for a decent payout is Amazon etc. which I think is pretty dangerous. I don't think it's good to completely be out of the major networks and on an island. Having media partners that have mutual interest in the Big 10 and/or SEC is a good thing. While it probably means less favorable time slots, the cross-promotion, adjacent game carryover viewership and of course being partner with the carrier of the playoffs are all important.

If the PAC goes all in with Amazon for example, the other conferences (through their media partners) now have only incentive to exclude them from any future reorganization. There's enough overlap and entanglement in broadcast rights among the Big 10, SEC, Big 12 and ACC to incentivize success. And the price being paid to the Big 12 is not as large as the SEC and Big 12, but it's way too high to be viewed as the G5 "on the cheap" content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
Maybe, but then the Big12 moves on to Cal or Stanford. I doubt UW wants to be in the MWC until 2030 and hoping for a Big10 invite.

A Big12 invite to any Pac12 schools is a 6 year engagement. In 2030 if the Big10 or SEC decide to add ACC or Big12 schools, whether its Oregon, Washington, Kansas or Iowa State they would all jump at the chance.
I’m sorry but Cal or Stanford would just end athletics or go independent before they joined the big 12. I love the big 12 and think it’s an awesome conference but the snobbery/politics at those two schools would simply never permit them to join the Big12. You think Stanford wants any connection to WVU?
 
  • Like
Reactions: awd4cy and PickSix
I feel that Yormark needs to approach ESPN as ask how can the Big12 support ESPN's desire to fill the late night Saturday time slot. Pac12 After Dark has traditionally meant a 9:30p CT kick-off.

Posted before I finished.

Yormark should approach Disney and see if the 9:30CT late slot on ESPN is a must. Or would Disney be willing to adjust their schedule to go with the following CT kickoffs: 10:30a, 1:30p, 5:00p and 8:30p. With that schedule ESPN could jump ahead of Fox Big Noon.

The Big12 could offer its 3 schools in the East TZ for the 10:30a CT slot. ESPN could also approach the SEC and ACC conferences to see if they would have interest.

Yormark could see if the 8 Big12 schools in the Central TZ would be willing to kick 1 or 2 home games a year at 8:30p (maybe 9p if ESPN pushes back). BYU already has some 9:15p CT start times, so not much of a stretch for them. They might actually like the visibility to play 3-4 home games a year in the after dark time slot.

This approach could give Disney/ESPN pause for being part of the Pac12's future TV Media Rights. Why invest hundreds of million each year in the Pac12, when they have already made an investment in the Big12, SEC and ACC conferences media rights. IMO that could spell the end of the Pac12 if their next deal is so reliant on a streaming service.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclone27inQC
Completely agree. Every major end game prediction theyve had has been way off. The Big 10 is about 8 teams lighter than projected. The NCAA is still here and so are all the conferences

The 3 scenarios I think could happen are

Big 10 and SEC stop at 20 because they'll hit diminishing returns. The other is that the top of the Big 10 and SEC

Big 10 and SEC eventually go to war post ACC to raid money schools from each other.

Someone gets in the ear if the elites in both conferences and they leave the to pursue more money, taking a few rivals with them and a few middle-of-the-roaders for 16-20 teams. In the contract is a competitive clause where sustained runs of poor play can lead to teams being removed.

Was VT? did not know that. Thought UVA may have been. With the appetite for expansion in the Big 10 being seemingly low I think they'll take 2 max. Without knowing the comishs stance its tough to know.

For Miami that ones a pipedream for sure. IDK if the SEC is the move. Clemson and Florida State feel like locks and IDK the SEC, who hasnt doubled dipped in expansion in the last 3 rounds will will want to triple dip in this one.

How about the SEC and B1G expanding to 24-ish teams with 4 divisions and a playoff. Sell the packages like the NFC-AFL deals the NFL has

Then you corner the OTA market, have content for ESPN - Fox - Comcast and rake in the cash
 
We haven’t really seen a politics clash like this. The politics move with UCLA was about leaving cal behind. Outside of that UCLA fits in very well with the big ten. Washington to the big 12 is a totally different animal.

You act like the BIg 12 is so far beneath Washington. You act like the conference is an STD. Well then piss on UW then, let them hope and pray the B10 calls a coming or fall further into irrelevance where no one cares about the west coast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
How about the SEC and B1G expanding to 24-ish teams with 4 divisions and a playoff. Sell the packages like the NFC-AFL deals the NFL has

Then you corner the OTA market, have content for ESPN - Fox - Comcast and rake in the cash
No one wants NFL lite. This is message board fodder and has never been talked about as something that is happening in the near future.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CoKane
I’m sorry but Cal or Stanford would just end athletics or go independent before they joined the big 12. I love the big 12 and think it’s an awesome conference but the snobbery/politics at those two schools would simply never permit them to join the Big12. You think Stanford wants any connection to WVU?

That's fine, if Cal & Stanford want to drop sports and become the equivalent to Cal-Poly. But their options are pretty limited and it's not like WSU, OSU or MWC schools are Ivy league caliber schools either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan
That's fine, if Cal & Stanford want to drop sports and become the equivalent to Cal-Poly. But their options are pretty limited and it's not like WSU, OSU or MWC schools are Ivy league caliber schools either.
Yep super limited, no idea what they do athletically if the PAC dissolves.
 
I found it interesting that Ross Dellenger went out of his way multiple times to say that the Big 12 may be talking to SMU as well. It’s just conjecture, but he’s as plugged in as it gets, so he’s probably at least hearing something behind the scenes. He talked about a “turf war” that’s going on between Yormark and Kliavkoff on multiple fronts.

Will be interesting to see what happens. It’s the first topic they cover below:

I love this podcast. Forde isn’t for everyone but I like him and they just have fun and call **** as they see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickSix

Help Support Us

Become a patron