.It would be the end of Matt Campbell as well at Iowa State. We couldn’t afford to pay him.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.It would be the end of Matt Campbell as well at Iowa State. We couldn’t afford to pay him.
I don't think OU is an AAU member school so the Big 10 won't take them.If Texas goes independent, OU and KU to big 10. OU would play Texas in the non conference.
Memphis, Houston, Colorado state(Denver area ish), Northern Illinois(Chicago area ish), Cincinnati we have options if they bolt. All pretty big markets. It won’t happen and the big 12 will be all but dead. But it’s something that doesn’t get mentions especially CSU and niu.
I just don't see Virginia leaving the ACC.
Yeah like I said in my other post if that happens the Big 12 is a dying conference. You were the one saying let them leave as if it wasn’t a big deal.
UVA administration would love to be in the Big 10.Agree. Although I didn't think Maryland would leave, either, so what do I know?
Trust me. Being in the SEC is more prestigious than being in the Big 12. Ask every A.D. who has left. A&M and Missouri are better off as an athletic department going 7-5 in the SEC than goin 10-3 in the Big 12. If being scared of competition was good for your brand nobody would have ever left. $$$$$ builds facilities. Mizzou is better off financially than they ever have been.
We had nowhere to go but up.We are financially better off than ever as well, and we didn't go anywhere.
There's no use panicking about this. But, if it were to happen, we would be screwed.
My first big worry about this is the immediate effect on recruiting.
10 years ago, right as Rhoads shouldve been capitalizing on momentum from early wins, realignment hit and he couldnt promise recruits we'd even be in a P5 conference by the time they got there. Now, we're considerably farther along, but this has to have an effect.
Regarding the original article, to me it seems a question how serious any discussions have gotten. Texas and OU are really the only programs that would have a reason to look at leaving and demand from other conferences. It makes sense that they'd do their due diligence in kicking the tires on their options before re-signing their next deal. It still seems like it'd be a dumb move in the end though.
Rutgers and Maryland had 2 jobs when they joined the B1G. 1) jam the monthly BTN fee down each local cable subscriber’s throat even though most didn’t want it, 2) lose to Ohio St, Michigan and Penn State in football which allowed the East-West divisions. The Scarlet Knights and Terps have succeeded.Why did they add Rutgers and Maryland then? What do they bring to the conference other than big TV markets? If it was about better rivalries and balance wouldn't Pitt and Syracuse been better schools?
This feels ... contradictory.
Texas won’t get in because they need an unanimous vote from all SEC schools. A&M will block them from getting in.