There is no policy, Dochterman's article is wrong.
You are wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no policy, Dochterman's article is wrong.
How rebellious of him by going over his monthly allowance already. You think every single Iowa player is abiding by these rules doing this time of turmoil?Not true he has had 2 tweets within the last 24 hours that were not re-tweets.
You are wrong
No I am not, there is no pre-approval or monthly limit. Dochterman is wrong.
No I am not, there is no pre-approval or monthly limit. Dochterman is wrong.
Why are you here then and not doing dochtermans job?
Sympathizing with riots and destruction of property is most definitely political. There is only one side of the political spectrum that is currently sympathetic to going beyond the peaceful protesting, and if you can't see that, then you aren't paying attention to anyone outside of your own political sphere. Don't try to equate this with the American revolution to justify the rioting.Stating that the American revolution started with protests and riots is hardly political. Both sides are discussing the vandalism in Iowa City through the lens of the world right now, which has been politicized but shouldn't be (human rights are human rights). We've deleted almost entirely only posts speaking against a certain political figure, posts that I personally agree with, but should be kept in the Cave.
So, I guess on your question of consistency - I could certainly even things out by deleting MORE of the posts I don't agree with, but I'm sure you'd have something to say about that?
Sympathizing with riots and destruction of property is most definitely political. There is only one side of the political spectrum that is currently sympathetic to going beyond the peaceful protesting, and if you can't see that, then you aren't paying attention to anyone outside of your own political sphere. Don't try to equate this with the American revolution to justify the rioting.
Okay so do we know the entire context of the rule? Is it only for during the season? Is it only pre-approved when dealing when the tweet involves the football program? Trying to prove the rule is made up by pointing out guys tweeting during this time is invalid. There's no way the program is limiting tweets during this period of time due to the current political climate as well as the accusations being brought forth against Kirk and his staff.
Wut? Translate please.Should not overshoot when firing losing attempts knowing everything.
So Tom Kakert is wrong too?No thanks
Okay so do we know the entire context of the rule? Is it only for during the season? Is it only pre-approved when dealing when the tweet involves the football program? Trying to prove the rule is made up by pointing out guys tweeting during this time is invalid. There's no way the program is limiting tweets during this period of time due to the current political climate as well as the accusations being brought forth against Kirk and his staff.
So Tom Kakert is wrong too?