What's the name of that one guy on Duke? I think it starts with a "Z". He's pretty good but doesn't get much pub.
Is it Zion Griffin?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's the name of that one guy on Duke? I think it starts with a "Z". He's pretty good but doesn't get much pub.
Is it Zion Griffin?
Right. I agree it is too broad. It was just an observation. They will be a bit higher, as the NET rankings haven't been updated since last night's game. Still, a road win against a team many would agree is poor could still be a quadrant 1 one under the current setup.Actually, Penn State #75 in NET) counting as a Q1 road win this exposes a major flaw in the NET rankings. I fully expect the NCAA to tighten up the Q1 and Q2 ranges for next year because right now the ranges are WAY to broad.
I totally agree but somebody else here posted a link that the committee already kind of does this by breaking the Q1’s into Q1a and Q1b so the PSU win would fall in the latter categoryActually, Penn State #75 in NET) counting as a Q1 road win this exposes a major flaw in the NET rankings. I fully expect the NCAA to tighten up the Q1 and Q2 ranges for next year because right now the ranges are WAY to broad.
You know you're loaded with talent when you beat out Kansas for a kid that can't even get minutes at ISU
With that type of talent you would think ISU would finally break the Kansas stranglehold on the Big 12 this year since KU is down.
Is Kansas down?
I would think so. They are usually in line for a top 2 seed. Be lucky to get a top 4 seed so far this year.
I totally agree but somebody else here posted a link that the committee already kind of does this by breaking the Q1’s into Q1a and Q1b so the PSU win would fall in the latter category
Sagarin too, correct?Yes, the committee essentially realized that they screwed up the ranges. What strikes me as weird though is that you don't hear any of the networks talking about Q1a or Q1b wins. Also, if you paid attention to how the top 16 were selected it appears that the committee is basically going all in on Net, BPI, and Kenpom.
Sagarin too, correct?
Actually, Penn State #75 in NET) counting as a Q1 road win this exposes a major flaw in the NET rankings. I fully expect the NCAA to tighten up the Q1 and Q2 ranges for next year because right now the ranges are WAY to broad.
Is being down the same as players being hurt?I would think so. They are usually in line for a top 2 seed. Be lucky to get a top 4 seed so far this year.
Is being down the same as players being hurt?
Losing Azibuke is huge, IMO.
Yep, just saying that KU is ripe for the picking this year.
The problem is that they still won't lose at home and too many teams crap themselves at home against Kansas. Seriously, Iowa State is the only team in the conference that has had decent success against KU over the last several years. I agree that KU is ripe for the picking but Self is a magician.
Well this has got to be the year to unseat them. If not, I'm not sure another Big 12 team wins the conference for the next 10 years.
If that’s the case you guys are sitting good. Think you only dropped 3 with the TCU lossAlso, if you paid attention to how the top 16 were selected it appears that the committee is basically going all in on Net, BPI, and Kenpom.
If that’s the case you guys are sitting good. Think you only dropped 3 with the TCU loss