Biggest disadvantage in the CyHawk Series since 1980

And Iowa players referring to it as just week 2.


Then why is he tweeting about it?

It's kind of like if, say, a bunch of Iowa fans came over to a rival's board, to argue with that rival's fans about really petty things, acting like it's not a rivalry, but also taking the time and energy to dig up and post things like tweets, players/coaches' quotes, etc. on that board to try to prove that it's not a big deal.
 
So he's not even part of the program or in the facilities? Lol great source for information
Lol you really think this facet of how they put the same emphasis on each game has changed from the previous 5 years?... You’re struggling early today, sir.
 
Lol you really think this facet of how they put the same emphasis on each game has changed from the previous 5 years?... You’re struggling early today, sir.

Hasn't Kirk completely changed his philosophy over the years? Kirk 2.0 right?
 
It’s be naive to believe that he’s changed every single facet... You better just take the rest of the day off buddy.

Or I could just trust the Iowa beat writer who's actually in the football facilities and talking with the current players when he says they emphasize the game instead of some former player I've never heard of
 
It’s be naive to believe that he’s changed every single facet... You better just take the rest of the day off buddy.


You wouldn't have to change every facet, besides, how much does a LS get involved in the main parts of everything. They usually are off on their own with the kickers and punters working out.
 
Or I could just trust the Iowa beat writer who's actually in the football facilities and talking with the current players when he says they emphasize the game instead of some former player I've never heard of

You don't think it is a big game? Weird, the ISU players are saying it is the Super Bowl.
 
Then why is he tweeting about it?

It's kind of like if, say, a bunch of Iowa fans came over to a rival's board, to argue with that rival's fans about really petty things, acting like it's not a rivalry, but also taking the time and energy to dig up and post things like tweets, players/coaches' quotes, etc. on that board to try to prove that it's not a big deal.
(Crickets chirping in the background)
 
I heard Knipel said that, which other players since you are using a plural statement?

Why would a player tell the media that if it isn't the sentiment in the entire locker room and building for that matter?

Listen there is nothing wrong with that, it is a big game with an in state rival, he used the work "Super Bowl", which to me isn't a big deal. Both teams put emphasis on this game and at the same time it is still just one of 12 or in ISU's case 11 games.
 
One player said it was Iowa's Super Bowl yes and I agree with him. Just another non conference game for Iowa State

You try to hard it seems. First only stats matter when looking at QB's, but rushing stats don't matter for RB. Now it is just another game, mum, ok.
 
Why would a player tell the media that if it isn't the sentiment in the entire locker room and building for that matter?

Listen there is nothing wrong with that, it is a big game with an in state rival, he used the work "Super Bowl", which to me isn't a big deal. Both teams put emphasis on this game and at the same time it is still just one of 12 or in ISU's case 11 games.


Because that is what he thinks? maybe?. So, if one person says or does something, it means its indicative of the whole team. You have problems.
 
Because that is what he thinks? maybe?. So, if one person says or does something, it means its indicative of the whole team. You have problems.

You don't think this game is different than the other 10 games ISU plays this year? Then you must think the same thing of Iowa. Me I'm not that dumb, I understand both teams emphasize this game, some kids call it the Super Bowl even.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron