Agreed...a baseline 8-4 would be the average, but anywhere from 6 to 10 wins could happen. Very favorable schedule this year...gets tougher next year, although 3 of the first 4 are nice cupcakes.
Ferentz's Emphasis on the ISU Game
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
Oh I agree it's favorable. My main candidates to be better than expected are Maryland and Purdue. Maryland has had some pretty good recruiting classes recently and eventually I think that translates....Purdue made strides last year and has a heck of a coach.
We'll see though....
Death, taxes and ISU fans complaining about SOS.
I'm not complaining about anything. I'm extremely jealous honestly
Northern IL- 70% chance loss
ISU- 90% ISU wins
UNI-Win
Minnesota- 60% Minnesota wins
Indian- 60% Iowa
Maryland- win
PSU- loss
Purdue- 60% Purdue
NW- 75% NW
IL- win
N- Split
It will be a big struggle for them to get to 6.
LOL. If you were half as smart as you think you are, you'd be able to understand what other people are saying. All you're doing is taking your original interpretation and running it even farther into the ground. Again, you are literally too stupid to even argue with. I sincerely hope you're trolling. If not, keep working towards that C in remedial English.
This actually leads me to wonder what kind of shape end-of-season Nebraska will be in. What will Frost have put together after 11 games?
Tell us about how accurate your predictions have been for Iowa in the past.
Pretty accurate. I missed the Iowa vs ISU game last year. We gave it away at the end but whatever. Iowa isn't hard to predict. Start at 7-5 and then see if they have some experience and an easy schedule and move up and down by 1 or 2 accordingly. The fact that you lost so many important players for week 1 tells me that you will lose that game. We are significantly better than you this year, and although it will be closer than it should be, we win that one for sure this year You will pick up a few wins against the crappy Big 10 but getting to 6 won't be easy. I'm going to say 5-7. New line, new running backs, new LB's, no d-line depth, weak secondary, and no receivers. You have a returning QB who is just ok. That's it. You should be happy with 5 wins. Lucky for you, the Big 10 has some terrible teams.
*12-2 and no, there are extreme outliers. I didn't have them going 4-8 whenever that was either. Most years they are within range In 2015 they had the easiest schedule in the history of football and got luck several times. And to be fair they got smoked when they had to play a real time.
K-State has proven Iowa’s style would be very effective in the Big 12. On the other hand iSu would bring nothing unique to the Big 10.
yep, I'm going to state the facts even if they are facts you hok fans can't handle.
You are deflecting because you know you are wrong. CyTwins posted @ me months after the argument had gone away... How else am I supposed to take the following quote from CyTwins?
CyTwins said: ↑
How so? I told you Auburn wanted him, you mocked that and now they're saying this:
Side note: I was told true freshman defensive end Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames