Ferentz's Emphasis on the ISU Game
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
Twins says a recruit is a big get. You and others disagree. Twins says that Auburn was after him. You say there's no proof. Then Twins posts a quote from the coaching staff about how high they are on him. You take that as Twins trying to prove Auburn was after him, rather than the much more obvious line of thinking that he was a big get.
I literally can't dumb it down any further past that.
Don't forget I posted an article where it was stated Auburn went all the way up to Wisconsin to see him and Halsted confirmed on the VIP boards Auburn offered him
He's not smart enough to figure out what that means. I tried to use the fewest and smallest words I could.
I'll break it down how you are wrong sentence by sentence.
Twins says a recruit is a big get.
You and others disagree. Show me where I said he wasn't a big get. I never once said that.
You say there's no proof. I said there is no proof he had an Auburn offer.
Then Twins posts a quote from the coaching staff about how high they are on him.
CyTwins said: ↑
How so? I told you Auburn wanted him, you mocked that and now they're saying this:
Side note: I was told true freshman defensive end Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames
You take that as Twins trying to prove Auburn was after him, rather than the much more obvious line of thinking that he was a big get. That is LITERALLY what he was doing. How can that be disputed? Do you need me to quote the quote above again? McDonald is a good get for you guys.
I literally can't dumb it down any further past that. Please do, because you have zero ground to stand on.
I figure he has a couple. So one of these is his current use one. Dudeman is probably what will get used after another ban or two.
It would take a minor miracle for Iowa's schedule to end up being anything but favorable. I don't think I'm out of line to say it will be
Here's what I would expect if I was an Iowa fan:
Northern IL win
ISU split (probably 60% sure on a W)
UNI win
Wisconsin loss (20-30% chance of a W)
Minnesota split
Indiana win
Maryland win
PSU loss (very small chance of a W)
Purdue split
NW split (probably 60% sure on a W)
IL win
N win
I don't think the 2 losses are unreasonable. I don't think splitting ISU, MN, Purdue, and NW is unreasonable.
Could you imagine having a schedule like that? Damn that would be nice
@CY88CE11
I'll break it down how you are wrong sentence by sentence.
Twins says a recruit is a big get.
You and others disagree. Show me where I said he wasn't a big get. I never once said that. This was my understanding, otherwise, what is the argument? Ho-lee cow. So you're just making things up now? The argument was whether or not he had an Auburn offer.
You say there's no proof. I said there is no proof he had an Auburn offer. Twins posted a link with proof. I apologize, reading comprehension is required for you to understand it. The link did not list an Auburn offer. I'd love for you to show me where it did.
Then Twins posts a quote from the coaching staff about how high they are on him.
CyTwins said: ↑
How so? I told you Auburn wanted him, you mocked that and now they're saying this:
Side note: I was told true freshman defensive end Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames
You take that as Twins trying to prove Auburn was after him, rather than the much more obvious line of thinking that he was a big get. That is LITERALLY what he was doing. How can that be disputed? Do you need me to quote the quote above again? McDonald is a good get for you guys. Again, reading comprehension. He's adding proof to the opinion that McDonald was a good get. Saying Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames provides ZERO proof that he had an offer from Auburn. How do you not get that? It's mind bottling.
I literally can't dumb it down any further past that. Please do, because you have zero ground to stand on. The ground underneath me feels pretty firm. A nice structural clay underneath the building foundation makes you feel pretty comfortable. I see some cracks in that foundation!
I'll break it down how you are wrong sentence by sentence.
Twins says a recruit is a big get.
You and others disagree. Show me where I said he wasn't a big get. I never once said that. This was my understanding, otherwise, what is the argument? Ho-lee cow. So you're just making things up now? The argument was whether or not he had an Auburn offer.
You say there's no proof. I said there is no proof he had an Auburn offer. Twins posted a link with proof. I apologize, reading comprehension is required for you to understand it. The link did not list an Auburn offer. I'd love for you to show me where it did.
Then Twins posts a quote from the coaching staff about how high they are on him.
CyTwins said: ↑
How so? I told you Auburn wanted him, you mocked that and now they're saying this:
Side note: I was told true freshman defensive end Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames
You take that as Twins trying to prove Auburn was after him, rather than the much more obvious line of thinking that he was a big get. That is LITERALLY what he was doing. How can that be disputed? Do you need me to quote the quote above again? McDonald is a good get for you guys. Again, reading comprehension. He's adding proof to the opinion that McDonald was a good get. Saying Will McDonald is the best player this staff has ever recruited to Ames provides ZERO proof that he had an offer from Auburn. How do you not get that? It's mind bottling.
I literally can't dumb it down any further past that. Please do, because you have zero ground to stand on. The ground underneath me feels pretty firm. A nice structural clay underneath the building foundation makes you feel pretty comfortable. I see some cracks in that foundation!
If I had to guess, 2 of those opponents will be ranked (and ranked well) at the end of the year. I could see NW sniffing a 20-30 spot along with Iowa State.
I think OU (could be a playoff team), OSU, WV, and TCU are all top 20. I think K-State and Texas could be in that 20-30, and to be honest so should Iowa. So I think ISU could face almost twice as many ranked teams.