You'll notice that you won't see me doing a lot of that, because I view recruiting as basically a numbers game. High recruits are worthless without good coaching.
ISU takes the same level of kids and achieves more with them. So, I guess I owe you a 'congrats' for recruiting good kids then horribly underachieving with them? One of the big issues I do side with regarding the recruiting, itself, is that all recruits have flaws. You can try to judge similar recruits by the severity of their flaws; Fran does a terrible job of fixing and/or hiding his players' flaws.
I get it there are good posters here, that is why I am here. Most of you are very well informed. I just get a little irritated when it gets to be Iowa bashing season, Iowa fans reply with logical answers, but they are deemed wrong because recruit x,y,z is mid major level ect. They are just un athletic and have peaked ect. BUT ISU can improve because Prohm is just a better coach than Fran. That is not the whole truth of it. Last season was a flop by Fran and he would probably be the first to admit that. Players did not gel, coaches did not find a solution. But that happens in sports.
Next year can be different. He has shown he can improve a guys basketball skills. He has also shown flaws in his coaching philosophy. I think Fran can get these guys to improve but I am taking a wait and see approach. ISU fans on the other hand think another 14 win season is the ceiling. That is just to stir the pot putting in frankly.
ISU had its flaws too. Now you have 2 transfers and like 4 high quality guys coming in to play to go along with the current group. You have added 6 new good pieces but can only put 5 on the floor. you have 10-12 deep. How will they gel? How will they take their role? Is Prohm capable of getting these guys the promises he gave them? will their be chemistry issues? Lets not pretend ISU has not questions