Graham Couch: Iowa Basketball is a mid-major roster

Missing the tourney back to back years puts you on the hot seat at a basketball school. 3 in a row and you're gone
Except in Ia City where two in a row increases your buyout by millions. I wonder what three in a row will mean? Lifetime contract?
 
Its no secret that I'm a UNI guy and the future in Cedar Falls is incredibly bright for at least the next 4 years, but shouldn't it be concerning to Iowa fans that they're recruiting the same kids that UNI is?

UNI is good enough to beat Big Ten teams in one offs but there is no way that we could compete over a 20 game schedule.

UNI would finish ahead of Iowa in the B1G most years, definitely the next few.
 
I get it you hate Iowa, but it is still possible that they improve. What if some of the talent for ISU flops? It happens in sports. and the Big Ten shows about the same on the national level as the Big 12 every single year. We are not like the PAC 12. One bad year does not mean the BIG is terrible. Just like one bad year does not mean ISU is terrible.
And why is it so hard for you to see that it's questionable any of Iowa's players belong on a good, average, or even poor PAC 12 or BIG team. I'll give you that Pemsl, Dailey, Bohannon and company do flash the goods at times, which might at least appear to theoretically support the notion that if they fight and scratch and claw they can belong on an upper half of conference Power 5 squad if everything goes right, but to claim that they have already done this is certainly dubious at best...And even then, you're going to have a whole team of plucky role players who punch above their weight? Doesn't that sound a little mid-majory to you, too? No one denies that mid majors can flash at this level; You're paying good money for this! Is it not unthinkable someone else out there could give you more for less than Fran? If no, then... Well... Dang it, man that's the saddest thing in America.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kentkel
Yes, yes it is. And, fortunately, we don't have to rely mostly on coach's kid(s) and tie-ins with sons of fanatical fans as our means for recruiting and rebuilding. We are also open to taking a chance on Grad Transfers / Sit-outs to bolster our talent pool and competitiveness in practice.

You do all this and still finished in last place by 4 games last season?
 
A lot of Hawk fans seem to think Connor will be some kind of star player for them next season, and be All B1G or something. Where are they getting this from?

I saw him play in HS 3 times, and wasn't that impressed in any of those games. He really wants to play baseball, and that's where his future likely is too.

Thinker posted his projected starting lineup a page or two back and had Connor at PG and JorBo at SG, which is fine, but as he correctly pointed out- neither of these two can penetrate a defense or create on their own. Isn't that a HUGE concern for Hawk fans? It should be.

The only starter that Thinker had down as a creator/penetrator was Weiskamp at the 3, but do we even know if he's capable of that at the college level? I don't know about you, but I don't see Iowa being that much better on paper next year, and likely worse if Cook doesn't come back.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: carvers4math
Fran on grad transfers, "And you have to be respectful of the guys you have. Because if you bring in a grad transfer he's got to play. "

My translation... can't cut in to my son's playing time.
Fran hasn't gone the transfer route regardless if his sons are on the team
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone
It's a little early to say the rebuild has been completed, don't you think?

I know you go to bed every night hoping and praying that somehow someday franny will have the premiere program in the state dan.

But as smart as all your other predictions have been I like our odds.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron