If you look at SOR in ESPN's BPI it has generally been a good indicator of which teams will get in on the bubble. Nebraska's SOR is currently in the mid to high 30's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tennessee
Lmao, our non-con was tougher than theirs? Are you serious right now? Who did we play that's even comparable to Kansas and Creighton in non-con?
You and me both.You got me there, that's a game that I think I blocked from my memory forever. I was thinking back to December game.
Lmao, our non-con was tougher than theirs? Are you serious right now? Who did we play that's even comparable to Kansas and Creighton in non-con?
Lmao, our non-con was tougher than theirs? Are you serious right now? Who did we play that's even comparable to Kansas and Creighton in non-con?
Lmao, our non-con was tougher than theirs? Are you serious right now? Who did we play that's even comparable to Kansas and Creighton in non-con?
Iowa's having a rough year, but Fran is absolutely the man I want leading them into the future.Somebody guide this thread back to the topic at hand. I just think the Nebraska situation leads to some interesting debate when it comes to bubble talk.
It was. Not by a ton, but it was. 210 vs 268.Lmao, our non-con was tougher than theirs? Are you serious right now? Who did we play that's even comparable to Kansas and Creighton in non-con?
According to SOS, ISU did play a tougher non-con. ISU played Missouri, Boise St. and Tennessee which would be comparable.
Man, this is quite the hole you are digging
Kentucky should be on the bubble also but Espn has them in "Should be in". They haven't beaten anybody in the Sec.
Kentucky should be on the bubble also but Espn has them in "Should be in". They haven't beaten anybody in the Sec.
Just ignore that top 20 RPI they have...
I am ignoring it, they suck
You need to sit this one out
One of the criteria for NCAA selection is actually watching games and evaluating. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to watch Kentucky and realize that if they put it all together they are top 5 in terms of talent.I am ignoring it, they suck, beat A&M followed by a bunch of Sec bottom feeders. They beat West Virgnia on the road is why they are so high. Should be on the bubble with about 7 other Sec teams who are around .500
One of the criteria for NCAA selection is actually watching games and evaluating. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to watch Kentucky and realize that if they put it all together they are top 5 in terms of talent.