Texas:
PG's Felix (SR), Yancy (JR), 2 offers to 5 star 2016 PG's
SG's Holland (SR), 2 4 star FR signed for 2015
Wisky:
PG: Koenig (JR)
SG: Multiple upper classmen, Brent Prizil 4 star FR
OSU:
PG newberry (SR), Stevie Clark (JR), 4 star #29 FR Juwan Evans, 3 top 100 2016 offers out
SG: Phil Forte (SR), Melvin Frazier 4 star FR, 3 top 100 2016 offers our including Terrance Ferguson
Maryland:
PG: signed JUCO JR Jaylen Brantley, 2016 top 100 pg anthony cowan signed
SG: 4 star top 100's melo trimble and Dion Wiley (SO's), Malik Ellison 3 star signed (FR), 3 top 100 2016 offers out
MN I already covered pretty much, they would really be the only team out of these 5 that I could see would be as desperate for a guard as we are and make geographical sense and have any prior relationship with NN. Wisky would seem to make sense in a vacuum but the Bo Ryan factor makes this one unrealistic and they have more need at forward. Bo Ryan still RS's kids ffs.
Texas, OSU and Maryland make no sense and they don't really have any need at PG or SG. And once again that's not to mention that NN could just flat out not want to go to any of these places and wants to come to ISU (and possibly has all along) which is just as logical as anything you've put out there tonight. You're discounting of mutual interest is really where you went wrong here imo.
Can't say I agree with these assessments minus Maryland. Although I do appreciate a post with some substance and evidence backing it up. Just because there is a starter on a team for this year doesn't mean that team wants to turn down the #75 prospect in America.
And, AGAIN, there were two months where ISU was not recruiting NN. So him being dead set on ISU and ignoring other schools for ISU makes no sense because we weren't recruiting him until like 3 weeks ago.
And maybe I am making an assumption there are 4 or 5 schools in the nation NN would rather attend than USC for basketball. That is my speculation and maybe USC was his #2 dream school after ISU and he was just waiting for TJ to get hired by ISU and everything. If that is what happened I concede.
And I didn't even get in to the importance of banking scholarships, 5th years, and not immediately eligible transfers. If that doesn't answer the question of why every school in the nation isn't beating down the door for NN then there's nothing left to do but hope that Rhoadhoused wakes up sober tomorrow and stays that way.
And my whole point this whole time is that there are 60+ schools that you would think would be attractive to NN. Of those 60, there has to be 10 that would be interested in a player of his caliber, if he was that good.
Texas:
Felix is going to be a SR and averaged 8.7 ppg and 2 assists last year. You're turning down the #12 PG because of that? Just because of one year of Felix?
Noskowiak would be about 10 spots better than their best recruit, who signed under Rick Barnes. He is a PG but I think Noskowiak would fit under a combo guard role. They certainly have scholarships and are under a new regime.
Maryland:
Not going to lie Anthony Cowan did not show up when I looked at their class so I agree that that's probably notthe best fit since they have a top PG signed already. I can concede that, my mistake. They seemed to have a spot when I didn't know he existed....
Wisconsin: I know is not interested. But they don't have any PGs signed this year. Didn't sign one last year. Signed Koenig the year before. He'll be a JR, but it would make sense to not let an elite player in your home state go because you have one other recruit there 2 classes ahead of him. No different than Monte Morris and ISU.
OSU: How you could possibly act like OSU wouldn't take NN is beyond me. They have one PG commit who is ranked highly but their only other commit is an unranked PF.
Forte will be a SR, Hickey graduates, Newberry will be a SR, Stevie Clark isn't even on their roster anymore, Melvin Frasier is not committed to them and doesn't have them on his list on rivals.
Again, one SR and one recruit should not preclude you from taking a top talent combo guard.
I think I understand why we disagree so much now. If you view any team with an upperclassman PG as having no need for a top 80/100 player, that makes sense. I think teams are still very interested in players of that talent level even if they have upperclassmen there.
I will give you Maryland though.
Here's a team that has NO SHOT at wanting him:
PG- They have a JR who might be an AA next year. Plays over 30 minutes a game. No chance for immediate PT
SG-
1. They have a SR who will be in his 3rd year starting, and a new SO transfer coming in expecting big minutes at the SG spot, and he also has played some point in the past.
2. Their highest ranked recruit in the past 5 years out of high school is a 6'4 shooting guard who is only a JR and stands to play major minutes.
3. SG/Wing- They have a former top 40 ranked high school prospect that plays on the wing to compete for minutes as well, and he's only going to be a JR this year. I've seen some argue he is more of a SF/PG but I think he's pretty purely a wing, but 2s and 3s share a lot of minutes so I'll throw him in.
So I think we have very different definitions of the threshold a team needs to be at to accept an essentially free commit from the #75 player in the country, who can play 2 positions.
http://fat.gfycat.com/TepidFavorableHammerkop.webm
Last edited: