Lay off the drugs.
It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lay off the drugs.
In your case some drugs may be in order.It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
You think iowa is on the level of osu and ksu?It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
You think iowa is on the level of osu and ksu?
It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
No, we get Big Monday games because we're ******* good. With or without Hoiberg this year, we'll get the max 4 Big Monday games.
The last two years we've probably had the most exposure we've ever had and yet currently we have some of the worst HS recruiting that I can recall.
Exposure doesn't equal recruiting success apparently
Not sure this is totally true. The Hoiberg story has helped get some of these games.
Transfer recruiting will likely take a significant hit if Hoiberg leaves and Matt A gone.
But it's hard to worry about HS recruiting too much when we haven't gotten a significant HS recruit since Morris and Thomas in June (?) 2012.
Even if you want to consider him that, in the context of this conversation it points to high school recruiting not taking a hit if Fred leaves.So you don't feel Noskowiak was a significant get?
So you don't feel Noskowiak was a significant get?
Even if you want to consider him that, in the context of this conversation it points to high school recruiting not taking a hit if Fred leaves.
Wrong. For the most part the NCAA committee awards teams based on performance, not how many stories ESPN runs on them.
The upside to being a media darling is that it opens recruiting doors that otherwise may not be there. Unfortunately we missed that opportunity because Fred & Matt put all their eggs in the RV/Diallo baskets after not offering any long term commitments as to Fred's NBA timetable.
It all goes together though. We get Big Monday games and GameDay because of Hoiberg. We won't get that with most other coaches.
Most likely without Hoiberg, we'll be at the level of Oklahoma State, Iowa, Kansas State, etc.
You are so far off base its not even funny. You make it seem like the selection committee has their TI-89 graphing calculators out and making sure that every pick and move is a calculated approach. If you believe that, you are incorrect. Why did UCLA get in the tourney last year? It wasn't because they were actually a great team and the tourney selection team saw that. They are UCLA, and the brand alone brings them to the table. We have a brand as well, and we will lose that brand if Hoiberg leaves.
Plus or minus one seed but it's not a significant factor. UCLA was very close either way and in hindsight a very good choice considering they made it to the Sweet 16.
I don't buy your argument but at least use a better example of a team not deserving of a NCAA birth than one that made it as far as Fred did with his best team.
Lol, you remain a ray of sunshine. Than goodness you're here to keep us grounded.
Ucla made it to the 16's because of controversial call, and us ******** the bed. Good for them, they took advantage. They weren't a good team.
Cato team was once ranked 5th. Cato vs Woodbury?? Willoughby vs Olgesby? LMAOShe thinks our success level under Floyd was at a McCaffery led Iowa level...she has literally said that.
4th in '97 until they lost a stupid home game vs. Marquette. Iowa would have to put a body on Kenny Pratt!Cato team was once ranked 5th. Cato vs Woodbury?? Willoughby vs Olgesby?
LMAO