What will ISU be ranked?

Iowa is #22 #23? and ISU is #42?

Ken Pom doesn't seem to know what he is talking about. :rolleyes: Or she. Kenny Pom or Kendra Pom? Sounds like Jerry Palm or Harry Palm or whatever.


Iowa is not 20 spots better than Iowa State. WTF is this ranking about anyway? Pacing? WTF?
The difference in Iowa and ISU is Luka Garza vs Javan Johnson. Yes, in a sport with massive, constant turnover, crazy transfers and freshmen ready to play the previous season is still weighing heavily 13 games in. That and the fact that playing the 250th and 350th teams make a huge difference make it a terrible system for much of the year. Yet people use it like gospel.
 
The difference in Iowa and ISU is Luka Garza vs Javan Johnson. Yes, in a sport with massive, constant turnover, crazy transfers and freshmen ready to play the previous season is still weighing heavily 13 games in. That and the fact that playing the 250th and 350th teams make a huge difference make it a terrible system for much of the year. Yet people use it like gospel.


I've come to learn that the majority of people out there are either lazy, arrogant, or stupid. Sometimes all three. Especially those in the media.
 
First, it’s not going to be the average of the teams you play. If you played the worst possible 11 game schedule (348-358) you would have the worst schedule, but the average of the team you play would be #353.

Second, this is another problem I have with KP and CBB SOS metrics. It’s like when people used to complain about gaming the RPI. Swap out those 240-360 type teams with a bunch at around 200, and it makes a huge difference in noncon SOS, but probably doesn’t impact outcomes at all. Those teams are still bad and should be wins. There should be diminishing impact on SOS over a certain point.

But big 12 SOS is going to be NUTS. Plus KP will still factor in last year for another couple weeks.

There should be another column of Kenpom that splits out P6 NC games and non-P6 NC games. Going true road should get double weight, neutral floor quarter weight compared to the Non P6 games baseline. Or something idk. KP doesn’t like us but NET and Torvik do so it’s a wash probably.
 
There should be another column of Kenpom that splits out P6 NC games and non-P6 NC games. Going true road should get double weight, neutral floor quarter weight compared to the Non P6 games baseline. Or something idk. KP doesn’t like us but NET and Torvik do so it’s a wash probably.
Eventually when the stink of last year wears off and we get into conference play KP probably likes ISU more. The other thing that should absolutely change is have diminishing or no difference in SoS beyond 200 or 250. For teams that are in the NCAA hunt playing a team that's 250 or 350 really shouldn't matter, but in KP it sure does. It's like the old complaints about trying to game the RPI by scheduling teams that aren't very good, but are still not the 300 type teams.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron