Poor J'Covan Brown will be left on Babb Island never to be heard from again -- until the NIT starts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think we'll be considered underdogs in this one..but if somehow they have texas favored, I might have to take a quick flight to vegas.
Doug Gottlieb says this is a MUST win for Texas and Iowa State is in fact beatable, so Texas should walk away with W. What a *******.
Doug Gottlieb says this is a MUST win for Texas and Iowa State is in fact beatable, so Texas should walk away with W. What a *******.
Wow I can't believe that Vegas doesn't have us favored. We were just favored against a top 10 Baylor team and beat them just a few days ago and now we are dogs to a team not near as good as Baylor. I could maybe understand if it was at Texas but it is still at a neutral site.
Doug Gottlieb says this is a MUST win for Texas and Iowa State is in fact beatable, so Texas should walk away with W. What a *******.
Definitely odd, particularly given that Vegas usually accounts for injuries like that to Wangmene. But usually Vegas knows what it is doing . . . . What am I not considering?
They aren't predicting Texas to win. Texas has a more national brand and people will lean towards betting them over ISU based just on perception. Not to mention the back-against-the wall factor that novice bettors have a hard-on for.
If ISU were favored there'd be to much money on Texas for Vegas' liking.
Long story short: The betting line is not a prediction.
So, basically, Doug is saying we aren't Kentucky.
Let...me...write...this...down.
They aren't predicting Texas to win. Texas has a more national brand and people will lean towards betting them over ISU based just on perception. Not to mention the back-against-the wall factor that novice bettors have a hard-on for.
If ISU were favored there'd be to much money on Texas for Vegas' liking.
Long story short: The betting line is not a prediction.
They aren't predicting Texas to win. Texas has a more national brand and people will lean towards betting them over ISU based just on perception. Not to mention the back-against-the wall factor that novice bettors have a hard-on for.
If ISU were favored there'd be to much money on Texas for Vegas' liking.
Long story short: The betting line is not a prediction.
Wow I can't believe that Vegas doesn't have us favored. We were just favored against a top 10 Baylor team and beat them just a few days ago and now we are dogs to a team not near as good as Baylor. I could maybe understand if it was at Texas but it is still at a neutral site.
Definitely odd, particularly given that Vegas usually accounts for injuries like that to Wangmene. But usually Vegas knows what it is doing . . . . What am I not considering?
I think we win, but it concerns me to play a team desperate for a win. With Babb on Brown, I really like our chances.
Either one works for me. OSU is hurting and it is very hard to beat a team 3 times in a year (hence why most of us didn't want to play KSU in round 1).
They peed both Mizzou games down their leg and I doubt the players are going to want that feeling again. Frankly, I like the chances against Mizzou.
I guess I just don't buy the whole "Texas needs it more so they will play better" theory. How many times has ISU football been in that situation only to lose? Especially in the McCarney era. (I'm not ragging on McCarney, just trying to put the theory in the perspective of ISU fans).
Still, I'm not saying ISU's gonna, for sure, win. I just don't buy that line of logic.