Starting RB next year??

Who will be starting RB next year?


  • Total voters
    109
I don't think a lot of people realize how bad our line is. Nealy and Wimberly behind a good line this year would have been awesome. I almost feel bad for Wimberly for coming here. Until we have a solid O Line, none of our RBs will be very successful. I am glad we have been able to keep a decent stable here, hope the O Line can get there soon.
 
I don't think a lot of people realize how bad our line is. Nealy and Wimberly behind a good line this year would have been awesome. I almost feel bad for Wimberly for coming here. Until we have a solid O Line, none of our RBs will be very successful. I am glad we have been able to keep a decent stable here, hope the O Line can get there soon.

I agree completely!

RB was not the problem at all with this year's team. And it won't be the problem next year either. We have plenty of good enough RBs that can do the job if holes are created for them.
 
CPR said early in the season that Warren had shoulder surgery, so how much did he practice? And will he be able to put on the 10-15 pounds of muscle that he needed?
 
Hasn't it been said before that running back is one of the easiest positions to play at with little experience? If that's the case and Warren really is the real deal we will see a lot of him.
 
I emailed Rhoads last week about tryouts. Still waiting for an email.

I haven't lifted a weight in 4 years, but I'm really good in NCAA Football at finding the gaps, and blocking when I need to. I think if I workout 2-3 times a month, I'd be in good enough shape.

Just not sure if "ISUCubswin" will fit on my jersey
You would probably fill more gaps if you stand in one spot and let the action come to you instead of our linebackers who run out of position.
 
I agree completely!

RB was not the problem at all with this year's team. And it won't be the problem next year either. We have plenty of good enough RBs that can do the job if holes are created for them.
Running back was also not the solution.
 
Warren is the real deal. I could see him starting, and I could see Nealy starting then Warren quickly taking over. Neither would surprise...

Similar to the Harris/Miller thing. Harris will be better than Miller at LB, but Miller was ahead with the playbook and would have started so the gave Harris the RS.
Neeley does not have enough oomph to break tackles after a yard gain.
 
Running back was also not the solution.

RB's did not hurt us this year. With no blocking it doesn't matter.

Wimberly especially was good enough to run for a LOT of yards with any kind of blocking at all.
 
RB's did not hurt us this year. With no blocking it doesn't matter.

Wimberly especially was good enough to run for a LOT of yards with any kind of blocking at all.

Took him a year and a half to figure out how to rush for 500 yards. Not the solution. Too small.
 
Who decides which RB's are on the field each series? I'm not sure any other teams do more to negate RB specific skill set than ISU. Seems to be very poor situational adjustments on our part. Wimberly in the game on short yd situations is a perfect example. Why wouldn't Nealy, a guy who almost always finds wiggle room to get a yard or two get the ball in that situation? We aren't at the point that we have prototype every down backs, we need playcaling and playing time to be dictated by what our guy do well. Hopefully MM having a year with our guys has helped him get to know players and cater our gameplan to our strengths. Until then, it won't matter who is playing.
 
I think Nealy starts early on, but as Warren gains more experience, he begins to take over the bulk of carries.
 
Word on the street is that Nealy will be the main back. Warren has a lot of potential from what I've heard. They're expecting Ozigbo to be ready to go.
 
I think Nealy will start but we need to find ways to use his skills. We wasted 4 years of Jarvis's West abilities, we need to find non traditional ways to get DN involved. He needs to be running reverses from the slot, catching bubble screens etc. Pigeon holing him into a pure RB is wasting his talent. We need to find ways to get him in space and let him make plays. He isn't a 1000yrd rushing type of guy but he could def be a 1000yd from scrimmage guy.
 
I would assume Nealy and Warren are both going to get carries. Brown, Ozigbo and Syria will probably fight it out for a handful of carries a game. Ozigbo likely has the edge since he brings something the other RB's can't, with his size advantage.
 
I think Nealy will start but we need to find ways to use his skills. We wasted 4 years of Jarvis's West abilities, we need to find non traditional ways to get DN involved. He needs to be running reverses from the slot, catching bubble screens etc. Pigeon holing him into a pure RB is wasting his talent. We need to find ways to get him in space and let him make plays. He isn't a 1000yrd rushing type of guy but he could def be a 1000yd from scrimmage guy.

This is it in a buttonhole. We have talents and the staff fails to fully utilize them. They need to get smarter next year. We do not appear to be an organized team or well planned as a game goes along.
 
It really depends on Warren doing the work this off season. If he's added the 10-15 pounds and strength he needs...look out, because the kid can burn it up. Work ethic is still the question though, and he's going to have to impress the coaches...and more importantly his teammates...by becoming a leader in the weight room. His potential and ability are all Big 12 caliber, but he still has to earn it. FYI, not saying he doesn't have a good attitude...definitely not a trouble maker or any such thing...but does he have the strength of personality to mold himself to be a star? I think Nealy absolutely starts out as the main guy...but Warren will get his chance because RB's always take a beating in this day and age. Especially our RB's.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron