This. Everyone seems to remember just the UNC game and fail to forget pretty much end of every first half of the season where it dribbled it around at the top of the key for 20 seconds, not looking for a pass, then jacked up a three that he missed 100 percent of the time. I love what he did for us and that UNC play was huge, but he did this almost every game and it drove me nuts.
I remember getting snipped at in one thread a few months ago for saying that DeAndre wasn't "the closer" for the team. Yes, the UNC bull rush was awesome, but I remember so many of those games with you at the end of halves where he did exactly that--dribble out the play clock at the top of the key, jack a long, contested three, clang, not leave enough time for any rebounds or secondary activity (but not enough for the other team to take it the other way), and that's the half or the game. It was awful.
End of games last year, if I have one play, it's...
1. give it to Niang, or let him bring it up do and do Niang things in either finding a shot no defender saw, a pass nobody saw but the shooter/after it is up, Kane/Ejim/Hogue crash boards and try to get a put-back or a secondary
2. set play for Naz to take a three/same deal with the board crashing
3. DeAndre drive, a la UNC, to either draw a foul or make the shot
The main reason #3 is #3 is because it often turned into the sections above, which were suboptimal to say the least.
Notice that 2/3 of that is still available for next year, though? Plus more/better/more experienced shooters, a leaner Niang, and BDJ, who might be able to do #3 with more efficiency, and/or Nader, who might be able to do the same and has the same sort of shiftiness? You'll have Hogue and McKay to crash boards, whatever happens, to see if they can pull a putback or win a quick scrum/kickout right afterward? All sorts of options... we'll be fine...