I have no problem if Rhoads sounded defensive if he was defending the failure of a player to pull off a play that Rhoads called, and that had been practiced, if he was pressed with Q's about the execution, and not about the decision itself.
Especially since Rhoads already said it was a methodically planned play based on what the staff had seen during the game, and he already said in the postgame that "we just failed to execute."
It'd be a little different if there was an in-game option for a holder to fake, and the player decided to use it at that point, and then failed. I can't imagine a college coach allowing that much freedom, but I mention that purely for perspective.
Note: I won't blame the wind for the bad throw, but when I saw him float it to a wide-open receiver, the throw looked like it had just the right touch.
Especially since Rhoads already said it was a methodically planned play based on what the staff had seen during the game, and he already said in the postgame that "we just failed to execute."
It'd be a little different if there was an in-game option for a holder to fake, and the player decided to use it at that point, and then failed. I can't imagine a college coach allowing that much freedom, but I mention that purely for perspective.
Note: I won't blame the wind for the bad throw, but when I saw him float it to a wide-open receiver, the throw looked like it had just the right touch.
