It's okay; sometimes I don't like to admit hypocrisy, either.
Or listen to reason, I've noticed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's okay; sometimes I don't like to admit hypocrisy, either.
Or listen to reason, I've noticed.
The ring thing might validate him. You ignored that.Oh, is that what you're calling it these days?
Fine, using your terms, sometimes I don't like to admit to "reason", either. Like when I say one coach is only successful because he happens to coach very talented players, but not saying the same thing about another coach with even more talented players. That's "reason", right?
The ring thing might validate him. You ignored that.
Oh, is that what you're calling it these days?
Fine, using your terms, sometimes I don't like to admit to "reason", either. Like when I say one coach is only successful because he happens to coach very talented players, but not saying the same thing about another coach with even more talented players. That's "reason", right?
How about the part where I mentioned that Spoelstra led Miami to 47 wins, and the 5th best defense in the league, with a front line of Beasley, Richardson and Jermaine O'Neal? Did you skip right over that part?
You were touting what Scott Brooks had done with Westbrook, while previously bashing him in this thread.
I never made that argument at any point. All I have stated is that Scott Brooks should not be considered a good coach if he loses in a series to Vinny Del Negro, and that you can't have it both ways with Westbrook. A well developed player won't cost your team 2 games in a 7 game series.
But then again, I was arguing earlier that Westbrook is a good player, and that the Thunder will beat the Clippers. And never said anything against Scott Brooks. Just against your arguments and claims that appear to be contradictory in my mind...
"Brooks helped make Westbrook" is touting him as great?
what the ****?
Of course players can cost series...did you watch the Heat-Thunder series? Westbrook was a big reason they lost it...
Of course players can cost series...did you watch the Heat-Thunder series? Westbrook was a big reason they lost it...
"Brooks helped make Westbrook" is touting him as great?
You are mis-remembering that series. It was the fact that Harden disappeared more than anything else. (If you are blaming the Thunder for losing)
So, did you watch the Heat Thunder series? No way I blame Westbrook for losing.
Westbrook averaged 27 points, 6.6 assists, 6.4 rebounds, 2.2 turnovers per game in the finals last year.
You are mis-remembering that series. It was the fact that Harden disappeared more than anything else. (If you are blaming the Thunder for losing)
So, did you watch the Heat Thunder series? No way I blame Westbrook for losing.
Westbrook averaged 27 points, 6.6 assists, 6.4 rebounds, 2.2 turnovers per game in the finals last year.
Spoelstra isn't a great coach, He just has 3 of the top 25 players in the league.