Lol

So what was the worst part for you?

1) QB play?
2) Lack of rushing (at least we knew OL would suck going in)?
3) Penalties?
4) Beyond questionable coaching and game management ( how do you call a time out immediately following an opponents timeout because you are unorganized, or better yet, sending the 12th guy in late for the kick off?
5) All of the above?

All the above.
 
Look at the bold Hawk fan. ISU won't likely beat your bonerific team next week, but I am quite sure you and all the other coward hawk trolls who spend most of your free time over here telling us how much you don't care about ISU will quickly disappear if the Cyclones manage to beat the Hawks.
Wasn't trolling, bud. I promise. Just trying I lighten the mood
 
So what was the worst part for you?

1) QB play?
2) Lack of rushing (at least we knew OL would suck going in)?
3) Penalties?
4) Beyond questionable coaching and game management ( how do you call a time out immediately following an opponents timeout because you are unorganized, or better yet, sending the 12th guy in late for the kick off?
5) All of the above?

Coaching. We knew the team wouldn't be good. I did, however, expect coaches that had been billed to us as this genius group of guys to appear to have stepped on a football field.

The good thing is that if they do anything right next week, I'll be impressed. They certainly started so badly that they'll have to improve.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: jkclone
I honestly don't get blaming this on Lanning. He threw for 250 yards and 3 TDS, and also threw 2 35yd+ TDs. Park would have done no better, and I personally guarantee that. If we can't win games with 250+ & 3, we have bigger problems than QB.

If anything, it was lame playcalling otherwise, and the utter absence of anything resembling a running game. I honestly hated our playcalling for the most part, it was very vanilla and seemed easily predictable. I'm aware that Lanning also threw 2 INTs in crunch time, but Warren fumbling in there didn't help either. One of the picks appeared to be a miscommunication about routes between him and a receiver (not sure if I blame Lanning, receiver, or coaching calling route changes for that), and the other was a forced pressure throw trying to make a play happen--that one was a bad decision. The fact that we had about 50 total rushing yards with a previous 1,300-yard RB at the helm is a very serious problem.

Giving up 250 rushing yards to UNI wasn't good, either, but I can get why. We had a hell of a time trying to contain Bailey.
 
As for Lazard, it's not like we underused him. He had what, 9 catches for 130 yards and a TD? He can't do much better than that, that's a great game. He did his part for sure.

Another small detail I didn't like: Netten missing the XP. Not sure if it was a bad hold or what.
 
I honestly don't get blaming this on Lanning. He threw for 250 yards and 3 TDS, and also threw 2 35yd+ TDs. Park would have done no better, and I personally guarantee that. If we can't win games with 250+ & 3, we have bigger problems than QB.

If anything, it was lame playcalling otherwise, and the utter absence of anything resembling a running game. I honestly hated our playcalling for the most part, it was very vanilla and seemed easily predictable. I'm aware that Lanning also threw 2 INTs in crunch time, but Warren fumbling in there didn't help either. One of the picks appeared to be a miscommunication about routes between him and a receiver (not sure if I blame Lanning, receiver, or coaching calling route changes for that), and the other was a forced pressure throw trying to make a play happen--that one was a bad decision. The fact that we had about 50 total rushing yards with a previous 1,300-yard RB at the helm is a very serious problem.

Giving up 250 rushing yards to UNI wasn't good, either, but I can get why. We had a hell of a time trying to contain Bailey.

I thought Lanning was pretty good in the pass plays downfield for most of the game. I also thought that Lanning HAS to know better and the coaches have to drill it into his head that he has to throw it away at the end. Also the safety was a freaking disaster. He almost fumbled it out of the end zone. Turns out that would have been better because we gave up a TD right after it.

I think the worst play of the game BY FAR was the play call to give Warren the ball late when he fumbled. There wasn't a lot of time left. Lazard was in a zone. The running game had been non existent all game. And Warren now has a habit of fumbling late in games when the game is on the line.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The_Gent
Didn't watch the whole thing (as your network is an actual embarrassment and even though I'm a Hawk fan, I feel bad that you have to put up with such an embarrassing TV situation) but what I saw was an O-line that couldn't even allow a pretty good running back to gain 3 YPC against an FCS team at home... That won't be fixed by next week.


Back to the TV thing, those commentators were also jokes. Was that Sage Rosenfels explaining to the audience that it was important for ISU to stop UNI from getting the 2-point conversion because it would allow for an ISU TD to win the game? I wanted to pull my hair out listening to those idiots, and that's not even me being an ***hole


98% of "Hawk fans" never stepped foot in a U of Iowa classroom and most can't name two starters on their adopted team, yet love to lecture us

too funny
 
98% of "Hawk fans" never stepped foot in a U of Iowa classroom and most can't name two starters on their adopted team, yet love to lecture us

too funny
I was at the game so I don't have first hand experience but the tv stuff sounded really bad.
 
I don't mind razzing and smack talk from Iowa fans who actually are U of Iowa alums (We deserve it)

Nothing worse than the UNI grad who wears Hawkeye attire at an UNI-Iowa FB game and cheers against their alma mater, and then despises ISU and mouths off to ISU grads.

Those people the biggest wannabee d#cks ever.

on a related note, my 40-something friend that I rode with was walking in the night post-game to our car which was parked off Beach Ave in a frat lot.....a group of 6-7 UNI students who were walking were harassing and cursing my ISU buddy from behind

Is it me or are some of these millennial a-holes simply have ZERO respect for GenX and younger baby boomers? It's really sad
 
I honestly don't get blaming this on Lanning. He threw for 250 yards and 3 TDS, and also threw 2 35yd+ TDs. Park would have done no better, and I personally guarantee that. If we can't win games with 250+ & 3, we have bigger problems than QB.

If anything, it was lame playcalling otherwise, and the utter absence of anything resembling a running game. I honestly hated our playcalling for the most part, it was very vanilla and seemed easily predictable. I'm aware that Lanning also threw 2 INTs in crunch time, but Warren fumbling in there didn't help either. One of the picks appeared to be a miscommunication about routes between him and a receiver (not sure if I blame Lanning, receiver, or coaching calling route changes for that), and the other was a forced pressure throw trying to make a play happen--that one was a bad decision. The fact that we had about 50 total rushing yards with a previous 1,300-yard RB at the helm is a very serious problem.

Giving up 250 rushing yards to UNI wasn't good, either, but I can get why. We had a hell of a time trying to contain Bailey.

Well be practically gave UNI a touchdown when he fumbled it. Him taking that safety didn't help much either... That's now even mentioning the TWO chances he was given for a game winning drive, and just threw an INT both times. Garbage
 
I don't mind razzing and smack talk from Iowa fans who actually are U of Iowa alums (We deserve it)

Nothing worse than the UNI grad who wears Hawkeye attire at an UNI-Iowa FB game and cheers against their alma mater, and then despises ISU and mouths off to ISU grads.

Those people the biggest wannabee d#cks ever.

on a related note, my 40-something friend that I rode with was walking in the night post-game to our car which was parked off Beach Ave in a frat lot.....a group of 6-7 UNI students who were walking were harassing and cursing my ISU buddy from behind

Is it me or are some of these millennial a-holes simply have ZERO respect for GenX and younger baby boomers? It's really sad
Get off my lawn
 
Didn't watch the whole thing (as your network is an actual embarrassment and even though I'm a Hawk fan, I feel bad that you have to put up with such an embarrassing TV situation) but what I saw was an O-line that couldn't even allow a pretty good running back to gain 3 YPC against an FCS team at home... That won't be fixed by next week.


Back to the TV thing, those commentators were also jokes. Was that Sage Rosenfels explaining to the audience that it was important for ISU to stop UNI from getting the 2-point conversion because it would allow for an ISU TD to win the game? I wanted to pull my hair out listening to those idiots, and that's not even me being an ***hole
Just what we need, some Hawk commenting on the ISU broadcast. I guess not everyone is up to the standard set by Ed "Passed out on the Pentacrest Lawn (after looking down some porker's shirt)" Podolak.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyChitwood
looked like a Rhoads team[/

Exactly the same, maybe worse, especially the last five to seven minutes. Amazing to watch the fans leave the stadium in droves when we got behind in the last seven minutes with plenty of time left for us to win the game. Left with their collective heads down, like, I've seen this way too many times before and I'm out of here.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron