I honestly don't get blaming this on Lanning. He threw for 250 yards and 3 TDS, and also threw 2 35yd+ TDs. Park would have done no better, and I personally guarantee that. If we can't win games with 250+ & 3, we have bigger problems than QB.
If anything, it was lame playcalling otherwise, and the utter absence of anything resembling a running game. I honestly hated our playcalling for the most part, it was very vanilla and seemed easily predictable. I'm aware that Lanning also threw 2 INTs in crunch time, but Warren fumbling in there didn't help either. One of the picks appeared to be a miscommunication about routes between him and a receiver (not sure if I blame Lanning, receiver, or coaching calling route changes for that), and the other was a forced pressure throw trying to make a play happen--that one was a bad decision. The fact that we had about 50 total rushing yards with a previous 1,300-yard RB at the helm is a very serious problem.
Giving up 250 rushing yards to UNI wasn't good, either, but I can get why. We had a hell of a time trying to contain Bailey.