IMO it only confirms my position that we were a 3 regardless of what happened in KC.
We might have gotten a 4 with a loss to Texas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO it only confirms my position that we were a 3 regardless of what happened in KC.
IMO it only confirms my position that we were a 3 regardless of what happened in KC.
Back to the original question. If we were the first #3 and KU was the last #2, it suggests to me that a blow out yesterday might have moved us to a #2 seed?
I'm smoking my Omaha tickets that I bought during the presale! And I think beating a team at least suggests that maybe we should be seeded above them. They must have been the last #2 and we must have been the first #3. That's close enough to have a conversation about it.
I don't believe margin of victory is a factor for the committee, at least it's not suppose to be.
I'm smoking my Omaha tickets that I bought during the presale! And I think beating a team at least suggests that maybe we should be seeded above them. They must have been the last #2 and we must have been the first #3. That's close enough to have a conversation about it.
I hope the B12 does do some damage but as a Jayhawk I think this team has the worst post presence they've had in a decade. I don't see them doing anything in this tourney. I like ISU's draw and think they have the best shot. Also like Baylor's.It was interesting how we were placed as the 9th best team, wonder how far we would have fallen if we didnt win the tournament especially since OU and Baylor are directly behind us. Cannot wait to see the damage this conference does in the tournament, its a night and day difference between the B12 and every other conference but maybe the top of the ACC.
Yeah that chair alluded it was VERY much part of their "eye test" with UCLA and Ole miss in their losses to Arizona and kentucky as reasons to get in.
Back to the original question. If we were the first #3 and KU was the last #2, it suggests to me that a blow out yesterday might have moved us to a #2 seed?
Maybe the committee actually liked ISU more than KU. They could have winked at each other and gave us the 3 seed in the south while giving KU the 2 in the Midwest with Kentucky.
KU won the reg. season crown over 18 games....We won the post season crown with 3 games in 3 days...KU played a better non-conf. schedule as well. Those two things beat us, but a nose. But I would rather not be the number 2 seed in the Midwest, and be in UK's bracket. Have fun with that, plus they got a no win match up with Wichita State. If KU wins, they should have won...If WSU wins, it could help WSU continue its program growth!