An actual buried story is that a conference got a 1 seed, a 1 seed, a 2 seed, and another 2 seed that was barely .500 in conference...and got absolutely obliterated other than one team that made the Elite 8.
Pac's underseeding was as big of a story. We need to shake up the way we select and seed teams. No conference is good enough that teams that are barely .500 should be getting 2 seeds while the regular season champion of other leagues are getting 5s and 7s. Net ranking said Ohio State was #8 with their paltry 12-8 league record so they get a 2 seed. Net ranking said Loyoyla was #10...but somehow no 3 seed for them. The ranking metrics have just become a way to favor pet teams and then ignore it for non-pet teams.
I really don't blame people if they don't want to promote Baylor as a champion since the school probably should have had its athletic department dismantled. I'd treat them similar to if I had to write a story about an organized crime syndicate that is known to be above the law. There are few better examples of why individuals and groups/corporations are absolutely nothing like each other than how Baylor's athletic department got away almost completely with running a rape ring and was basically free to just keep on running.