You too chief"When necessary"
Got ya, Chief.
Keep it in the cave
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You too chief"When necessary"
Got ya, Chief.
Keep it in the cave
No- but the haters from the cave like to take their shots, so I’ll take mine when necessary.
I asked an honest question.
The normal posters around here answered it and I appreciate it.
What about the players that were borrowing their teammates phones and also gambling in the football players lounge?
I doubt they can comment on an ongoing legal case.Has anyone (reporter, journalist, hack blogger/podcast host) asked the DCI any questions about this whole thing? The focus seems to be entirely on the universities and the student athletes. It seems fair to me that the DCI would have some sort of media availability about this case considering the time and effort they've put into investigating and prosecuting these alleged crimes.
I'd like to know how many non-student athletes they are prosecuting. Considering the quantity of athletes in the state they are pursuing, it stands to reason there are a considerable quantity of non-athletes that they would have also encountered doing the same things.
I'm not saying that being a student athlete is the same as being in a protected class under the law, but if the DCI is only going to charge athletes for their alleged underage and falsification of documents crimes, it seems to me that they are being too selective on who they enforce the law against.
Note:
I'll admit to not paying super close attention to this whole thing since it has dragged on and on all summer long. I've listened to all the CF and Iowa Everywhere podcasts so I imagine I'm about as updated as anyone as far as public information goes. Perhaps this has already been brought up and it completely missed me. My apologies if so.
They are releasing info about Iowa State football players yet no one has seen any info on non-players. It's not "commenting on an ongoing case" in a negative way to simply say "this is a statewide investigation and not targeted to any one team."I doubt they can comment on an ongoing legal case.
Well, if your next door neighbor’s 19 year old kid is involved, do you think the news media would care? The media is only showing players because that’s actually newsworthyThey are releasing info about Iowa State football players yet no one has seen any info on non-players. It's not "commenting on an ongoing case" in a negative way to simply say "this is a statewide investigation and not targeted to any one team."
It would be like a Rep DCI only releasing info on well-known state democrats. I'm not making this political, but that's the best example of a targeted investigation. It sure looks targeted.
Edit. I know people at work who has signed their spouse's name on phone contracts, and I know of one that did on a mortgage document. It just seems interesting all this popped up out of nowhere. Breaking NCAA rules isn't against the law and I doubt the DCI is scanning people's phones (also illegal) randomly. What tipped them off to even start this? And then, what tipped them off to investigate phone records? NCAA infractions don't typically involve law enforcement.
That's the problem anyway, they won 4 games.Part of me is very concerned that 25% of our starters are gone including QB, RB, TE, OL, and DL and part of me is saying “those starters won 4 games last year” and think we’ll be fine.
The charges were not published or released by the DCI. The charges were filed by county district attys based on the DCI investigation, and are a matter of public record once they are filed. Those affidavits contained many alleged discoveries and results of the investigation by the DCI. The media got their info from these filings.They are releasing info about Iowa State football players yet no one has seen any info on non-players. It's not "commenting on an ongoing case" in a negative way to simply say "this is a statewide investigation and not targeted to any one team."
It would be like a Rep DCI only releasing info on well-known state democrats. I'm not making this political, but that's the best example of a targeted investigation. It sure looks targeted.
Edit. I know people at work who has signed their spouse's name on phone contracts, and I know of one that did on a mortgage document. It just seems interesting all this popped up out of nowhere. Breaking NCAA rules isn't against the law and I doubt the DCI is scanning people's phones (also illegal) randomly. What tipped them off to even start this? And then, what tipped them off to investigate phone records? NCAA infractions don't typically involve law enforcement.
Well sure … but how will we arrange your payment to me when you lose.You want to put your $ were your mouth is?
Then he wasn't very good at it, cause he was the one who made the over hit in this instance...
Lee- sucks, but I trust the staff historically at that position in terms of development
Hanika- was not that impressed last year tbh, and we have a ton of up and coming talent getting rave reviews
Remsburg- was often injured anyway
Dekkers- not a great season last year, supposed leadership issues
Brock- this one hurts the most. We have a lot of depth there, but it's unproven, and he was set to be a star
That's my optimistic analysis of why this won't impact our win total all that much. Add in predicted benefits from new coaching staff and incoming recruits and I am predicting more than 4 wins, potentially up to 7 or 8 if things really click. I'd say 6 wins is what I predict.
This may be over optimistic, but I don't really see a point in being all doom and gloom in August. I'm pumped to see this team gut it out.
Sure..when ISU gets their third win you can send $1k to Brent Blum as I assume you have never supported ISU FB. Brent has my info…does he have yours?Well sure … but how will we arrange your payment to me when you lose.
The Legislature specifically did not have to allow betting on college teams in Iowa. The sports books basically got everything they wanted including a lower tax rate than most states.If people want someone to blame, blame the legislature for legalizing it. It was entirely predictable there would be problems such as this.
Looking at the ones reported, does this mean that no women at any university in Iowa ever placed a bet?
Lee- sucks, but I trust the staff historically at that position in terms of development
Hanika- was not that impressed last year tbh, and we have a ton of up and coming talent getting rave reviews
Remsburg- was often injured anyway
Dekkers- not a great season last year, supposed leadership issues
Brock- this one hurts the most. We have a lot of depth there, but it's unproven, and he was set to be a star
That's my optimistic analysis of why this won't impact our win total all that much. Add in predicted benefits from new coaching staff and incoming recruits and I am predicting more than 4 wins, potentially up to 7 or 8 if things really click. I'd say 6 wins is what I predict.
This may be over optimistic, but I don't really see a point in being all doom and gloom in August. I'm pumped to see this team gut it out.