When did I ever say "should". The only shoulds coming into this year were the STs (no reason why Campbell couldn't find a way to field a decent group) and some kind of improvement from a terrible OL. I find it hard to believe, as bad as it was last year, there wasn't a way to improve from within or find some guys in the portal.
Other than that there have been little in the way of "shoulds". On the other side of the spectrum you have what you "need" to do in order to win games. On that front I have repeatedly said our front 6 as a group is weak, with the LBs being extraordinarily weak, and that (I think) it would benefit Heacock to play more aggressively as I think it mitigates that weakness while leans on our strength (secondary). On the other side of the ball we started off with some Mickey Mouse play calling, and I'm still not a fan of shot gun snapping in short yardage situations, but there has been some positive strides there. The OL is still weak but they've show strides as a group, particularly last week, in being more cohesive. I've been pleased with Rocco but he has to start hitting some of those open home runs. We are talking 40-50 points potentially lost on him airmailing open guys. That's not a "should" rather a "need" as in we need it if we want to beat the teams other than most of the ones we've beaten thus far.
Make of that what you will. I just think some on here have a really hard time disseminating between expectations vs. the things we need or "should" be doing/trying to do to win games. Often they don't even overlap.
