Uconn is right up there too that's the top 2 7's imo. I'd love to have Houston's spotI think UConn is the best 7 and Clemson is the worst 7. I think Rutgers beats Clemson.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uconn is right up there too that's the top 2 7's imo. I'd love to have Houston's spotI think UConn is the best 7 and Clemson is the worst 7. I think Rutgers beats Clemson.
I think every 2 seed would like Houston’s spot. Ohio State either gets Florida or Virginia Tech. Two solid teams.Uconn is right up there too that's the top 2 7's imo. I'd love to have Houston's spot
But Iowa is the best 2 seed in NCAA history and should cake walk to the natty.Well said and i agree. I think Oregon is the best 7 seed in the tournament and i thought they would be heading into the tournament. Was hoping for Clemson who is an underdog to an average Rutgers team. Clemson is only a 7 because they had a great November/December. Ideally those are the teams i want to play
Aren’t they the worst 2 seed in the tournament..?But Iowa is the best 2 seed in NCAA history and should cake walk to the natty.
Mad Fran and the Progeny live at the arena!
Aren’t they the worst 2 seed in the tournament..?
No I'm just agreeing with you that Pollard is a very respected and powerful
But Iowa is the best 2 seed in NCAA history
Ah. 2nd worst.
3rd best
No, Iowa was seeded 7th overall.
Jamie Pollard probablyWonder why Iowa didn't get in Baylor's bracket?
Jamie Pollard probably![]()
If anything he’s doing exactly what Barta did. He’s giving Iowa a shot at an “overrated” Oregon teamHe couldn't repay the Barta favor I guess.
I didn't know I had a problem with any seedSo you don't have a problem with non conference champs being bumping up 3 or even 4 seed lines higher than their NET, but conference champs shouldn't be seeded higher than their NET?
Wonder why Iowa didn't get in Baylor's bracket?
I didn't know I had a problem with any seed
I don't think Oregon got a bad seed is all. I think Colorado is better than themThen why were you saying a conference champion shouldn’t be seeded better than its NET by 3 or 4 seed lines? If you don’t have a problem with other teams jumping up seed lines over their NET, why the issue with people saying a conference champion should have jump up seed lines over their NET ranking?
doesn't really matter in the end. Have to beat whoever they put in front of youI don't think Oregon got a bad seed is all. I think Colorado is better than them